Navigating ethical challenges in research ethics approval: A case study of social science research in Thailand

Debates surrounding the research ethics approval process in social science often center on the distinct nature of the field, which markedly differs from biomedical research, thereby influencing the relationship between research ethics committees and social scientists. This relationship is shaped by researchers’ attitudes and expectations, often revealing a disconnect between procedural compliance and genuine ethical reflection. While this issue is widely recognized, specific ethical challenges encountered by social scientists in the approval process, particularly in certain developing countries like Thailand, remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by identifying the ethical issues that social science researchers frequently face when seeking ethics approval. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study combines in-depth interviews with research ethics committee members and statistical analysis of 647 ( n = 647) research proposals submitted for ethics approval between 2021 and 2023 at a social science institution to better understand recurring ethical issues. The findings aim to inform the development of targeted solutions to address these challenges effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Ethics
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161251336573
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating ethical challenges in research ethics approval: A case study of social science research in Thailand

Wanaporn Techagaisiyavanit, Benjawan Mingmontchaikul, Supattra Keitleartthum
1 citations
Research Ethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
article

Navigating ethical challenges in research ethics approval: A case study of social science research in Thailand

Wanaporn Techagaisiyavanit, Benjawan Mingmontchaikul, Supattra Keitleartthum
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Debates surrounding the research ethics approval process in social science often center on the distinct nature of the field, which markedly differs from biomedical research, thereby influencing the relationship between research ethics committees and social scientists. This relationship is shaped by researchers’ attitudes and expectations, often revealing a disconnect between procedural compliance and genuine ethical reflection. While this issue is widely recognized, specific ethical challenges encountered by social scientists in the approval process, particularly in certain developing countries like Thailand, remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by identifying the ethical issues that social science researchers frequently face when seeking ethics approval. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study combines in-depth interviews with research ethics committee members and statistical analysis of 647 ( n = 647) research proposals submitted for ethics approval between 2021 and 2023 at a social science institution to better understand recurring ethical issues. The findings aim to inform the development of targeted solutions to address these challenges effectively.

Research EthicsVol. 22(1)
Mahidol University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.