Characterizing “data” for official statistics

With the dramatic and rapidly growing role of “data” in contemporary societies, there is increasing interest in how best to reflect this reality in countries’ official statistics. This paper suggest that an appropriately broad concept of “data” is essential, one that includes data flows as well as data bases . We motivate this approach for the recognition in official statistics of the value and importance of data in two parts. First is the need for evidence to support two major policy area, privacy and health, and then second by two more general concerns for which National Statistical Offices (NSOs) devote major efforts, inflation and entertainment. The main conclusion is that NSOs' efforts should focus on creating microdata “portraits” not only of data bases, but also the data flows among them. As a corollary, we argue that current efforts to include “data” under the rubric of digitalization in the System of National Accounts as a monetized capital stock is too limiting and arbitrary to be useful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Journal of the IAOS
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18747655251335765
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing “data” for official statistics

Michael Wolfson
Statistical Journal of the IAOS
Census and Population Estimation
article

Characterizing “data” for official statistics

Michael Wolfson
article en

Abstract

With the dramatic and rapidly growing role of “data” in contemporary societies, there is increasing interest in how best to reflect this reality in countries’ official statistics. This paper suggest that an appropriately broad concept of “data” is essential, one that includes data flows as well as data bases . We motivate this approach for the recognition in official statistics of the value and importance of data in two parts. First is the need for evidence to support two major policy area, privacy and health, and then second by two more general concerns for which National Statistical Offices (NSOs) devote major efforts, inflation and entertainment. The main conclusion is that NSOs' efforts should focus on creating microdata “portraits” not only of data bases, but also the data flows among them. As a corollary, we argue that current efforts to include “data” under the rubric of digitalization in the System of National Accounts as a monetized capital stock is too limiting and arbitrary to be useful.

Statistical Journal of the IAOSVol. 41(2)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Census and Population Estimation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.