Generalizability Theory Approach to Analyzing Automated‐Item Generated Test Forms

Abstract This study presents several multivariate Generalizability theory designs for analyzing automatic item‐generated (AIG) based test forms. The study used real data to illustrate the analysis procedure and discuss practical considerations. We collected the data from two groups of students, each group receiving a different form generated by AIG. A total of 74 students participated in this study and responded to AIG‐based test forms. Then, we analyzed the data using four distinct designs based on the data collection design, and conceptualization of true scores and measurement conditions over hypothetical replications. This study also examined the theoretical relationships among the four data collection designs and highlighted the potential impact of confounding between item templates and item clones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12671
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalizability Theory Approach to Analyzing Automated‐Item Generated Test Forms

Sungyeun Kim, Stella Yun Kim
1 citations
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
2.11
article

Generalizability Theory Approach to Analyzing Automated‐Item Generated Test Forms

Sungyeun Kim, Stella Yun Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study presents several multivariate Generalizability theory designs for analyzing automatic item‐generated (AIG) based test forms. The study used real data to illustrate the analysis procedure and discuss practical considerations. We collected the data from two groups of students, each group receiving a different form generated by AIG. A total of 74 students participated in this study and responded to AIG‐based test forms. Then, we analyzed the data using four distinct designs based on the data collection design, and conceptualization of true scores and measurement conditions over hypothetical replications. This study also examined the theoretical relationships among the four data collection designs and highlighted the potential impact of confounding between item templates and item clones.

Educational Measurement Issues and PracticeVol. 44(2)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Incheon National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.