“The eyes and ears of the railway”: How frontline workers uphold safety through their occupational expertise and embodied epistemic authority

Frontline workers who occupy public-facing, non-managerial roles are critical to the ongoing sociotechnical accomplishment of safety in complex systems, yet their role is often overlooked in relation to organizational safety programs, protocols, and training. In this paper, we examine how frontline workers make judgments about potential hazards during routine work and how they respond to organizational directives that contravene their expertise. Drawing on interviews with train drivers working for private franchises in the United Kingdom, our findings show how frontline workers’ safety culture and unique embodied knowledge constitute their epistemic authority which ultimately supports robust safety voice and listening in a complex sociotechnical system. We show how train drivers are subject to extensive organizational controls that are meant to realize safety, but that in practice these controls are insufficient for responding to the incidents that occur on the tracks. These findings offer insight into how frontline workers draw on occupational authority to uphold a societal mandate for safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Relations
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267251335859
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The eyes and ears of the railway”: How frontline workers uphold safety through their occupational expertise and embodied epistemic authority

Daisy Chung, Daniel B. Fisher
Human Relations
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

“The eyes and ears of the railway”: How frontline workers uphold safety through their occupational expertise and embodied epistemic authority

Daisy Chung, Daniel B. Fisher
article en

Abstract

Frontline workers who occupy public-facing, non-managerial roles are critical to the ongoing sociotechnical accomplishment of safety in complex systems, yet their role is often overlooked in relation to organizational safety programs, protocols, and training. In this paper, we examine how frontline workers make judgments about potential hazards during routine work and how they respond to organizational directives that contravene their expertise. Drawing on interviews with train drivers working for private franchises in the United Kingdom, our findings show how frontline workers’ safety culture and unique embodied knowledge constitute their epistemic authority which ultimately supports robust safety voice and listening in a complex sociotechnical system. We show how train drivers are subject to extensive organizational controls that are meant to realize safety, but that in practice these controls are insufficient for responding to the incidents that occur on the tracks. These findings offer insight into how frontline workers draw on occupational authority to uphold a societal mandate for safety.

Human RelationsVol. 79(3)
University of Sussex (GB), St George's, University of London (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“The eyes and ears of the railway”: How frontline workers uphold safety through their occupational expertise and embodied epistemic authority — Daisy Chung, Daniel B. Fisher · Human Relations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS