Empirical relationship between the Geological Strength Index (GSI) and rock mass quality (Q-system) in granite and sedimentary rocks

Abstract This paper presents the relationship between Rock Mass Quality (Q-system) and the Geological Strength Index (GSI) parameters. Equations are suggested based on field data and calculations of the empirical results of granitic rock masses (Hungary) and siltstones, sandstones and quartzite formations (Australia). Measured and calculated GSI values vs Q values are given for granitic rocks, showing a higher correlation than that of the sedimentary rocks of Australia. The different behaviors of rock masses explain the higher correlation between GSI vs Q and GSI chart vs GSI calculated for igneous rock bodies. Despite the differences in stress fields and the highly tectonised structural geological setting of the granitic rock mass, the isotropic nature of granitic rocks vs. anisotropy of sedimentary rock bodies is reflected in the correlation coefficients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04303-1
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical relationship between the Geological Strength Index (GSI) and rock mass quality (Q-system) in granite and sedimentary rocks

Ákos Török, Gábor Somodi, Neil Bar, Balázs Vásárhelyi
5 citations
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
4.32
article

Empirical relationship between the Geological Strength Index (GSI) and rock mass quality (Q-system) in granite and sedimentary rocks

Ákos Török, Gábor Somodi, Neil Bar, Balázs Vásárhelyi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the relationship between Rock Mass Quality (Q-system) and the Geological Strength Index (GSI) parameters. Equations are suggested based on field data and calculations of the empirical results of granitic rock masses (Hungary) and siltstones, sandstones and quartzite formations (Australia). Measured and calculated GSI values vs Q values are given for granitic rocks, showing a higher correlation than that of the sedimentary rocks of Australia. The different behaviors of rock masses explain the higher correlation between GSI vs Q and GSI chart vs GSI calculated for igneous rock bodies. Despite the differences in stress fields and the highly tectonised structural geological setting of the granitic rock mass, the isotropic nature of granitic rocks vs. anisotropy of sedimentary rock bodies is reflected in the correlation coefficients.

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the EnvironmentVol. 84(6)
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
4.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Empirical relationship between the Geological Strength Index (GSI) and rock mass quality (Q-system) in granite and sedimentary rocks — Ákos Török, Gábor Somodi, et al. · Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS