Confocal Laser Microscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery

One of the breast-conserving surgery goals is to achieve negative resection margins and avoid reoperation. Therefore, accurate intraoperative margin assessment is essential, but still challenging. Recently, confocal microscopy devices, such as Histolog Scanner (HS), have shown promise for intraoperative margin assessment. The aim of this study was to assess HS for the intraoperative examination of lumpectomy specimens by the pathologists of our institute. Intraoperative margin assessment was performed by macroscopic assessment and by HS imaging to provide information for re-excision decision-making. The specific contribution of HS was evaluated by comparing the HS-based findings with the final pathology reports based on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue analysis. The study population included 20 women with histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma who underwent breast-conserving surgery (mean age of 62.9 y; 41 to 88 y; 21 tumors in total). HS led to the same decision as macroscopic examination in 76.2% of cases and prompted additional re-excisions in 19% of cases. Compared with the pathology reports, the accuracy rates of the macroscopic and HS assessments were 81% (58.1 to 94.6) and 95.2% (76.2 to 99.9), respectively. Moreover, 5 cases are described to illustrate HS practical contribution and limitations. In conclusion, HS is user-friendly, generally reliable, and enhances the routine macroscopic examination by providing detailed imaging of lumpectomy specimens. In combination with macroscopic examination, HS is an effective tool for intraoperative margin assessment, assisting both pathologists and surgeons in making accurate intraoperative decisions regarding margin re-excision, thereby preventing the need for new surgical operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000002409
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confocal Laser Microscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery

Didier Pourquier, Evelyne Verdanet, Aurélie Maran-Gonzalez, Marian Gutowski et al.
4 citations
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
3.75
article

Confocal Laser Microscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery

Didier Pourquier, Evelyne Verdanet, Aurélie Maran-Gonzalez, Marian Gutowski, Cristina Leaha, Anne Mourrégot, Lakhdar Khellaf, Pierre Gémival, Julien Colard-Thomas, Antonia Pialoux-Guibal
article en
4 citations

Abstract

One of the breast-conserving surgery goals is to achieve negative resection margins and avoid reoperation. Therefore, accurate intraoperative margin assessment is essential, but still challenging. Recently, confocal microscopy devices, such as Histolog Scanner (HS), have shown promise for intraoperative margin assessment. The aim of this study was to assess HS for the intraoperative examination of lumpectomy specimens by the pathologists of our institute. Intraoperative margin assessment was performed by macroscopic assessment and by HS imaging to provide information for re-excision decision-making. The specific contribution of HS was evaluated by comparing the HS-based findings with the final pathology reports based on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue analysis. The study population included 20 women with histologically confirmed invasive breast carcinoma who underwent breast-conserving surgery (mean age of 62.9 y; 41 to 88 y; 21 tumors in total). HS led to the same decision as macroscopic examination in 76.2% of cases and prompted additional re-excisions in 19% of cases. Compared with the pathology reports, the accuracy rates of the macroscopic and HS assessments were 81% (58.1 to 94.6) and 95.2% (76.2 to 99.9), respectively. Moreover, 5 cases are described to illustrate HS practical contribution and limitations. In conclusion, HS is user-friendly, generally reliable, and enhances the routine macroscopic examination by providing detailed imaging of lumpectomy specimens. In combination with macroscopic examination, HS is an effective tool for intraoperative margin assessment, assisting both pathologists and surgeons in making accurate intraoperative decisions regarding margin re-excision, thereby preventing the need for new surgical operations.

The American Journal of Surgical PathologyVol. 49(9)
Université de Montpellier (FR), Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
3.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.