Decoding Sentiment Signals: Lessons From the Political Reception of the Common Core and Next Generation Science Standards

Two major sets of U.S. content standards have changed since 2010: the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Whereas the CCSS received widespread pushback, the NGSS were broadly uncontentious. Why? Drawing from policy learning and networked publics theories, we used mixed-effects modeling to estimate how tweet authors, hashtags, and time explain sentiment in almost 2 million tweets related to both reforms from 2011 to 2023. Politically motivated, negative tweets from heterogeneous individuals and organizations explained CCSS’s sentiment. In contrast, tweets discussing NGSS were more uniform across science education professionals. We propose two educational reform trajectories—(a) politically driven to gradually accepted and (b) niche-specific to widely accepted—to guide future policy actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Researcher
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x251336206
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Sentiment Signals: Lessons From the Political Reception of the Common Core and Next Generation Science Standards

Conrad Borchers, Yinying Wang, Emily M. Hodge, Joshua M. Rosenberg
Educational Researcher
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Decoding Sentiment Signals: Lessons From the Political Reception of the Common Core and Next Generation Science Standards

Conrad Borchers, Yinying Wang, Emily M. Hodge, Joshua M. Rosenberg
article en

Abstract

Two major sets of U.S. content standards have changed since 2010: the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Whereas the CCSS received widespread pushback, the NGSS were broadly uncontentious. Why? Drawing from policy learning and networked publics theories, we used mixed-effects modeling to estimate how tweet authors, hashtags, and time explain sentiment in almost 2 million tweets related to both reforms from 2011 to 2023. Politically motivated, negative tweets from heterogeneous individuals and organizations explained CCSS’s sentiment. In contrast, tweets discussing NGSS were more uniform across science education professionals. We propose two educational reform trajectories—(a) politically driven to gradually accepted and (b) niche-specific to widely accepted—to guide future policy actors.

Educational ResearcherVol. 54(7)
Georgia State University (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.