Making Sense of Segregation: Asian American Youth Perspectives

This qualitative study examines how 64 Asian American high school students and recent alumni in New York City make sense of racial and socioeconomic segregation across selective and nonselective public high schools; and what their sensemaking reveals about their understandings of race, class, and power. Nearly all interviewees believed that the underrepresentation of Black and Latine students at selective high schools is problematic, but they employed distinct frames to describe the nature of the problem and how to remedy it. Most students employed abstract liberalism and culture of poverty frames, lacking a critical analysis of race and power. Some students employed a conscious compromise frame, critiquing segregation as undermining the individual benefits of diversity. Fewer students employed a power analysis frame, pointing to the systemic factors shaping the racialized structure of educational opportunity. Findings reveal students’ uneven experience with, and analytic tools for, discussing race and Asian American identity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AERA Open
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251334374
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Sense of Segregation: Asian American Youth Perspectives

Elise Castillo
AERA Open
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Making Sense of Segregation: Asian American Youth Perspectives

Elise Castillo
article en

Abstract

This qualitative study examines how 64 Asian American high school students and recent alumni in New York City make sense of racial and socioeconomic segregation across selective and nonselective public high schools; and what their sensemaking reveals about their understandings of race, class, and power. Nearly all interviewees believed that the underrepresentation of Black and Latine students at selective high schools is problematic, but they employed distinct frames to describe the nature of the problem and how to remedy it. Most students employed abstract liberalism and culture of poverty frames, lacking a critical analysis of race and power. Some students employed a conscious compromise frame, critiquing segregation as undermining the individual benefits of diversity. Fewer students employed a power analysis frame, pointing to the systemic factors shaping the racialized structure of educational opportunity. Findings reveal students’ uneven experience with, and analytic tools for, discussing race and Asian American identity.

AERA OpenVol. 11
Spencer Foundation, National Academy of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Making Sense of Segregation: Asian American Youth Perspectives — Elise Castillo · AERA Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS