Alienation in the Algorithmic Labour of Search Engine Optimisation Specialists

ABSTRACT The study examines alienation in the labouring activity of Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) specialists and probes the role of Google's algorithm in these experiences. Drawing on qualitative interviews, it identifies two forms of alienation. The first form involves powerlessness and insecurity due to managerial control by objectives, making employees responsible for influencing an algorithm beyond their control. The second form, occupational status alienation, is marked by insecurity and lack of recognition, driven by a resource allocation mechanism disadvantaging SEO due to its algorithmic uncertainty. These findings enhance our understanding of alienation in algorithmic labour by emphasizing the need to examine workers’ algorithmic experiences within the broader context of capital‐labour relations. In SEO's case, experiences of alienation do not arise from interactions with opaque algorithm wielding power over labour but rather from a managerial model that holds employees responsible for achieving success within an environment defined by algorithmic uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Technology Work and Employment
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12341
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alienation in the Algorithmic Labour of Search Engine Optimisation Specialists

Mirela Ivanova, Friedericke Hardering, Oliver Nachtwey, Helene Thaa
1 citations
New Technology Work and Employment
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
article

Alienation in the Algorithmic Labour of Search Engine Optimisation Specialists

Mirela Ivanova, Friedericke Hardering, Oliver Nachtwey, Helene Thaa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study examines alienation in the labouring activity of Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) specialists and probes the role of Google's algorithm in these experiences. Drawing on qualitative interviews, it identifies two forms of alienation. The first form involves powerlessness and insecurity due to managerial control by objectives, making employees responsible for influencing an algorithm beyond their control. The second form, occupational status alienation, is marked by insecurity and lack of recognition, driven by a resource allocation mechanism disadvantaging SEO due to its algorithmic uncertainty. These findings enhance our understanding of alienation in algorithmic labour by emphasizing the need to examine workers’ algorithmic experiences within the broader context of capital‐labour relations. In SEO's case, experiences of alienation do not arise from interactions with opaque algorithm wielding power over labour but rather from a managerial model that holds employees responsible for achieving success within an environment defined by algorithmic uncertainty.

New Technology Work and EmploymentVol. 40(3)
University of Basel (CH), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.