The Redshift Evolution of the <i>M</i> <sub>BH</sub>–<i>M</i> <sub>*</sub> Scaling Relation: New Insights from Cosmological Simulations and Semianalytic Models

Abstract We study the coevolution of black holes (BHs) and their host galaxies in the A STRID and TNG300 cosmological simulations and the D ARK S AGE semianalytic model (SAM), focusing on the evolution of the BH mass–stellar mass ( M BH – M * ) relation. Due to differences in the adopted subgrid modeling of BH seeding, dynamics, and feedback, the models differ in their predicted redshift evolution of the M BH – M * relation. We find that it is the interplay between the star formation rate (SFR) and the black hole accretion rate (BHAR) that drives the evolution of the mean relation. We define a quantity <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:math> , the ratio between the specific BHAR and SFR (i.e., <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo>≡</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="1em"/> </mml:math> sBHAR/sSFR), and demonstrate that it is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:math> that governs the evolution of individual sources in the M BH – M * plane. The efficiency of BH growth versus stellar mass growth in the sSFR–sBHAR plane reflects the partitioning of gas between fueling star formation versus BH accretion. This partitioning depends on the implementation of BH dynamics and the nature of how black hole feedback quenches galaxies. In the cosmological simulations (A STRID and TNG300 ), the BHAR and SFR are intrinsically linked, resulting in a tight M BH – M * correlation, while the D ARK S AGE SAM produces a significantly larger scatter. We discuss these results in the context of recently discovered overmassive BHs and massive quenched galaxies at high redshift by the James Webb Space Telescope.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adbeef
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Redshift Evolution of the M BH–M * Scaling Relation: New Insights from Cosmological Simulations and Semianalytic Models

Priyamvada Natarajan, Nianyi Chen, Shashank Dattathri, Yueying Ni et al.
7 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
8.08
article

The Redshift Evolution of the M BH–M * Scaling Relation: New Insights from Cosmological Simulations and Semianalytic Models

Priyamvada Natarajan, Nianyi Chen, Shashank Dattathri, Yueying Ni, Colin J. Burke, Antonio J. Porras-Valverde, Tiziana DiMatteo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study the coevolution of black holes (BHs) and their host galaxies in the A STRID and TNG300 cosmological simulations and the D ARK S AGE semianalytic model (SAM), focusing on the evolution of the BH mass–stellar mass ( M BH – M * ) relation. Due to differences in the adopted subgrid modeling of BH seeding, dynamics, and feedback, the models differ in their predicted redshift evolution of the M BH – M * relation. We find that it is the interplay between the star formation rate (SFR) and the black hole accretion rate (BHAR) that drives the evolution of the mean relation. We define a quantity <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:math> , the ratio between the specific BHAR and SFR (i.e., <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mo>≡</mml:mo> <mml:mspace width="1em"/> </mml:math> sBHAR/sSFR), and demonstrate that it is <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-calligraphic" mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi> </mml:math> that governs the evolution of individual sources in the M BH – M * plane. The efficiency of BH growth versus stellar mass growth in the sSFR–sBHAR plane reflects the partitioning of gas between fueling star formation versus BH accretion. This partitioning depends on the implementation of BH dynamics and the nature of how black hole feedback quenches galaxies. In the cosmological simulations (A STRID and TNG300 ), the BHAR and SFR are intrinsically linked, resulting in a tight M BH – M * correlation, while the D ARK S AGE SAM produces a significantly larger scatter. We discuss these results in the context of recently discovered overmassive BHs and massive quenched galaxies at high redshift by the James Webb Space Telescope.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 984(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
8.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.