The Pleasure and Danger of Religious Sexualities

In this article, we make the case for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between sexuality and religion and offer strategies to advance the sociology of the sexualities subfield. We challenge the dichotomy often posed by sociologists of sexualities who implicitly or explicitly cast moral judgment on both sexuality and religion: Sexuality, as far as it represents queer possibilities and sexual freedom, is good. Religion, assumed to be restrictive and conservative, is bad. Instead, we argue that to fully understand the social and power dynamics of sexuality, religion, and their overlap, we must recognize the complex webs of meaning that allow sexuality and religion to produce great harm and destruction, but also to validate and uplift. We then explain how two bodies of scholarship offer productive approaches to move the study of religious sexualities forward: the sociology of emotions and postcolonial and decolonizing scholarship. Sociology must recognize the multiple ways in which religion and sexuality constitute a powerful combination in social life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex & Sexualities
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/3033371251329935
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Pleasure and Danger of Religious Sexualities

Dawne Moon, Kelsy Burke
1 links
Sex & Sexualities
Religion and Society Interactions
article

The Pleasure and Danger of Religious Sexualities

Dawne Moon, Kelsy Burke
article en

Abstract

In this article, we make the case for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between sexuality and religion and offer strategies to advance the sociology of the sexualities subfield. We challenge the dichotomy often posed by sociologists of sexualities who implicitly or explicitly cast moral judgment on both sexuality and religion: Sexuality, as far as it represents queer possibilities and sexual freedom, is good. Religion, assumed to be restrictive and conservative, is bad. Instead, we argue that to fully understand the social and power dynamics of sexuality, religion, and their overlap, we must recognize the complex webs of meaning that allow sexuality and religion to produce great harm and destruction, but also to validate and uplift. We then explain how two bodies of scholarship offer productive approaches to move the study of religious sexualities forward: the sociology of emotions and postcolonial and decolonizing scholarship. Sociology must recognize the multiple ways in which religion and sexuality constitute a powerful combination in social life.

Sex & SexualitiesVol. 1(1)
Marquette University (US), University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.