Comparative analysis of cloud and fog computing performance based on modeling

This study presents a comparative performance analysis of cloud and fog computing architectures based on simulation modeling. Cloud computing offers numerous advantages, including scalability, on-demand resource allocation, simplified deployment of applications and services. However, this evolution critically depends on efficient data transmission - a domain where principles of radio physics, such as signal propagation, interference management, and channel optimization, play a pivotal role. Fog computing extends cloud capabilities to the network edge, enabling localized processing and reducing response time. Using the Eclipse IDE and Java, two network models were developed to analyze key metrics: energy consumption, transmission delay, and network traffic under varying node topologies. The simulation results show that fog computing significantly reduces latency and distributes energy consumption more efficiently than traditional cloud systems. Correlation matrix analysis reveals that while latency and energy usage in cloud systems increase sharply with the number of devices, fog architectures exhibit better scalability and resilience. These findings highlight fog computing as a viable solution for real-time and IoT applications requiring low-latency responses and efficient resource distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Recent Contributions to Physics
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26577/rcph202592113
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of cloud and fog computing performance based on modeling

Akmaral Imanbayeva, K.B. Khairosheva Khairosheva, L. Sapina
Recent Contributions to Physics
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
article

Comparative analysis of cloud and fog computing performance based on modeling

Akmaral Imanbayeva, K.B. Khairosheva Khairosheva, L. Sapina
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative performance analysis of cloud and fog computing architectures based on simulation modeling. Cloud computing offers numerous advantages, including scalability, on-demand resource allocation, simplified deployment of applications and services. However, this evolution critically depends on efficient data transmission - a domain where principles of radio physics, such as signal propagation, interference management, and channel optimization, play a pivotal role. Fog computing extends cloud capabilities to the network edge, enabling localized processing and reducing response time. Using the Eclipse IDE and Java, two network models were developed to analyze key metrics: energy consumption, transmission delay, and network traffic under varying node topologies. The simulation results show that fog computing significantly reduces latency and distributes energy consumption more efficiently than traditional cloud systems. Correlation matrix analysis reveals that while latency and energy usage in cloud systems increase sharply with the number of devices, fog architectures exhibit better scalability and resilience. These findings highlight fog computing as a viable solution for real-time and IoT applications requiring low-latency responses and efficient resource distribution.

Recent Contributions to PhysicsVol. 92(1)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), Astana Medical University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.