Queer Data for Sociologists of Sexualities: Introducing SOGIESC Measurement and Methods During Political Suppression

Quantitatively capturing gender and sexuality using social surveys can be a controversial, political exercise—increasingly so in an age of political turmoil. Still, there is profound utility in quantitative metrics, particularly related to sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, and sex characteristics (SOGIESC). Indeed, scholars, under the banner of queer demography, leverage social scientific surveys to measure gender and sexuality at the scale of populations to make important inferences about LGBTQ+ lives. Therefore, this essay tracks the history, challenges, and potential opportunities for capturing survey-based, SOGIESC data. Specifically, we detail measurement developments related to sex and sex characteristics; sexual behavior; sexual orientation and identity; sexual attraction and desire; and gender identity and expression. Moreover, we showcase the challenges to capturing SOGIESC data amidst political turmoil. Though data purges have become a tactic of the second Trump administration, SOGIESC data have always been subject to state suppression—explaining the poor data environment and longstanding construct-to-operationalization mismatches. Paradoxically, the field of queer demography and survey-based measurement is simultaneously one of rapid innovation requiring emergency preservation. We ultimately call on sexuality scholars to help shape measurement practices, protect existing data, and ensure that knowledge about SOGIESC populations is not erased, while we still can.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex & Sexualities
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/3033371251329931
Citations
4
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Queer Data for Sociologists of Sexualities: Introducing SOGIESC Measurement and Methods During Political Suppression

Christina Pao, Jamie Budnick, Kristopher Velasco
4 citations
Sex & Sexualities
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
9.75
article

Queer Data for Sociologists of Sexualities: Introducing SOGIESC Measurement and Methods During Political Suppression

Christina Pao, Jamie Budnick, Kristopher Velasco
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Quantitatively capturing gender and sexuality using social surveys can be a controversial, political exercise—increasingly so in an age of political turmoil. Still, there is profound utility in quantitative metrics, particularly related to sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, and sex characteristics (SOGIESC). Indeed, scholars, under the banner of queer demography, leverage social scientific surveys to measure gender and sexuality at the scale of populations to make important inferences about LGBTQ+ lives. Therefore, this essay tracks the history, challenges, and potential opportunities for capturing survey-based, SOGIESC data. Specifically, we detail measurement developments related to sex and sex characteristics; sexual behavior; sexual orientation and identity; sexual attraction and desire; and gender identity and expression. Moreover, we showcase the challenges to capturing SOGIESC data amidst political turmoil. Though data purges have become a tactic of the second Trump administration, SOGIESC data have always been subject to state suppression—explaining the poor data environment and longstanding construct-to-operationalization mismatches. Paradoxically, the field of queer demography and survey-based measurement is simultaneously one of rapid innovation requiring emergency preservation. We ultimately call on sexuality scholars to help shape measurement practices, protect existing data, and ensure that knowledge about SOGIESC populations is not erased, while we still can.

Sex & SexualitiesVol. 1(1)
Princeton University (US), Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
9.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Queer Data for Sociologists of Sexualities: Introducing SOGIESC Measurement and Methods During Political Suppression — Christina Pao, Jamie Budnick, et al. · Sex & Sexualities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS