It just would not work for me: perceived preference heterogeneity and consumer response to AI-driven product recommendations

Purpose Previous research has not examined the influence of perceived preference heterogeneity, a contextual antecedent, on consumer response to artificial intelligence (AI)-driven recommendations. This paper aims to address this gap by exploring this issue through the theoretical perspective of lay belief, which suggests that AI recommendations, often thought to rely on “collective wisdom,” may overlook individual idiosyncratic preferences. Design/methodology/approach A survey (involving 159 consumers) is conducted to provide general evidence (across product categories) for the impact of perceived preference heterogeneity on consumer acceptance of AI-driven recommendations. Three follow-up experiments with 597 participants provide causal evidence and examine the mediating role of cognitive trust (versus affective trust) as well as the moderating role of recommendation framing and the human likeness of the AI recommender. Findings Perceived preference heterogeneity negatively affects consumer acceptance of AI-driven recommendations, which is caused by decreased cognitive (rather than affective) trust. The effect is eliminated when the unfavorable lay belief is attenuated by a personal-based (versus others-based) recommendation framing and by increasing the AI recommender’s human likeness in cognitive ability or appearance. Research limitations/implications This paper conducts survey and lab experiments, and future research may use field experiments to provide further evidence. Future research may extend the study to categories where consumers are highly uncertain about their own preference and use highly humanlike AI recommenders. Practical implications Companies may highlight the personalization nature of the recommendations rather than the powerful and “collaborative” recommendation process. When consumers perceive high preference heterogeneity, companies would better use personal-based framings and increase the AI recommender’s human likeness in cognitive ability or appearance. Originality/value This research shows that perceived preference heterogeneity is an important antecedent that hinders consumer acceptance of AI-driven recommendations because of consumers’ unfavorable lay belief. This research also suggests that AI (when adopted to offer product recommendations) may not generate positive responses even in the cognitive domain, whereas most research focuses on its lack of affective abilities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Marketing
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-02-2023-0082
Citations
5
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It just would not work for me: perceived preference heterogeneity and consumer response to AI-driven product recommendations

Xinyi Ma, Luping Sun, Yanfei Tang
5 citations
European Journal of Marketing
AI in Service Interactions
12.40
article

It just would not work for me: perceived preference heterogeneity and consumer response to AI-driven product recommendations

Xinyi Ma, Luping Sun, Yanfei Tang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose Previous research has not examined the influence of perceived preference heterogeneity, a contextual antecedent, on consumer response to artificial intelligence (AI)-driven recommendations. This paper aims to address this gap by exploring this issue through the theoretical perspective of lay belief, which suggests that AI recommendations, often thought to rely on “collective wisdom,” may overlook individual idiosyncratic preferences. Design/methodology/approach A survey (involving 159 consumers) is conducted to provide general evidence (across product categories) for the impact of perceived preference heterogeneity on consumer acceptance of AI-driven recommendations. Three follow-up experiments with 597 participants provide causal evidence and examine the mediating role of cognitive trust (versus affective trust) as well as the moderating role of recommendation framing and the human likeness of the AI recommender. Findings Perceived preference heterogeneity negatively affects consumer acceptance of AI-driven recommendations, which is caused by decreased cognitive (rather than affective) trust. The effect is eliminated when the unfavorable lay belief is attenuated by a personal-based (versus others-based) recommendation framing and by increasing the AI recommender’s human likeness in cognitive ability or appearance. Research limitations/implications This paper conducts survey and lab experiments, and future research may use field experiments to provide further evidence. Future research may extend the study to categories where consumers are highly uncertain about their own preference and use highly humanlike AI recommenders. Practical implications Companies may highlight the personalization nature of the recommendations rather than the powerful and “collaborative” recommendation process. When consumers perceive high preference heterogeneity, companies would better use personal-based framings and increase the AI recommender’s human likeness in cognitive ability or appearance. Originality/value This research shows that perceived preference heterogeneity is an important antecedent that hinders consumer acceptance of AI-driven recommendations because of consumers’ unfavorable lay belief. This research also suggests that AI (when adopted to offer product recommendations) may not generate positive responses even in the cognitive domain, whereas most research focuses on its lack of affective abilities.

European Journal of MarketingVol. 59(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
AI in Service Interactions
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.