Classification in the Wider Philosophical Perspective of Informational Ontology. Lecture 1: Bibliographic Classifications

Authors in library and information science like Dewey, Otlet, Bliss, Ranganathan, Vickery, Kyle, Foskett, Austin and Dahlberg have developed a rich corpus of classification theory and practice, covering important techniques like hierarchical subdivision, facet analysis and ordering of arrays by integrative levels. The advent of digital information offers an opportunity to organize information using such techniques; but this heritage has often been forgotten in the illusion that automation has made it unnecessary. Nowadays bibliographic classification is subsumed in the field of knowledge organization, which covers the conceptual ordering of contents in libraries, archives, museums, digital collections and knowledge in general. We propose a broad view of knowledge organization as an intellectual guide to learning and scholarship grounded in philosophical ontology. Established classification principles can contribute their techniques for the production of general schemes of phenomena.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information and Knowledge
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2025/v62i2/171793
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification in the Wider Philosophical Perspective of Informational Ontology. Lecture 1: Bibliographic Classifications

Claudio Gnoli
1 citations
Journal of Information and Knowledge
Cognitive Science and Education Research
1.43
article

Classification in the Wider Philosophical Perspective of Informational Ontology. Lecture 1: Bibliographic Classifications

Claudio Gnoli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Authors in library and information science like Dewey, Otlet, Bliss, Ranganathan, Vickery, Kyle, Foskett, Austin and Dahlberg have developed a rich corpus of classification theory and practice, covering important techniques like hierarchical subdivision, facet analysis and ordering of arrays by integrative levels. The advent of digital information offers an opportunity to organize information using such techniques; but this heritage has often been forgotten in the illusion that automation has made it unnecessary. Nowadays bibliographic classification is subsumed in the field of knowledge organization, which covers the conceptual ordering of contents in libraries, archives, museums, digital collections and knowledge in general. We propose a broad view of knowledge organization as an intellectual guide to learning and scholarship grounded in philosophical ontology. Established classification principles can contribute their techniques for the production of general schemes of phenomena.

Journal of Information and Knowledge
University of Pavia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cognitive Science and Education Research
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Classification in the Wider Philosophical Perspective of Informational Ontology. Lecture 1: Bibliographic Classifications — Claudio Gnoli · Journal of Information and Knowledge (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS