Performance Evaluation of Five Different Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Monodisperse Test Aerosols

Abstract Purpose The performance of five different low-cost particulate matter sensor models has been characterized with monodisperse DEHS particles by comparing particle number and mass concentrations in different size fractions to the results of an optical particle counter (Palas welas) used as reference. Methods The five investigated sensor models are the SDS011 (NovaFitness), SPS30 (Sensirion), NextPM (Groupe Tera), OPC-R2 and OPC-N3 (both Alphasense). To obtain information on the intra-specimen variability, five specimens of each sensor model were tested. Three different parameters were investigated, namely the number and mass-based detection efficiency between 0.15 and 5 μm for different particle concentration levels, accuracy of size fractionation, and dynamic response to rapid concentration changes. Results NextPM and SDS011 were less suitable for detecting DEHS particles than the other models. With the NextPM sensor, the measured number concentrations sometimes deviated by more than a factor of 10 from the reference. The other sensor models have their own advantages and disadvantages, depending on the purpose of the measurement. Compared to the OPC-N3 and OPC-R2, the SPS30 for instance is capable of detecting higher number concentrations, but only with a much lower size resolution than the OPC-N3 or OPC-R2. Conclusions Overall, the experiments have shown that the OPC-R2 and OPC-N3 sensors are the most suited ones for laboratory applications with DEHS-particles at concentrations of < 1500 P/cm 3 . They have a comparably size-independent counting efficiency for d P ≥ 0.5 μm and are able to accurately measure particle number size distributions. They also show the most dynamic response to rapid concentration changes with a t 10-90 time constant of around 1.5 s compared to the other sensors (> 4 s). Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44408-025-00019-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Five Different Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Monodisperse Test Aerosols

Dieter Bathen, Christof Asbach, Martin Nothhelfer, Ana Maria Todea
2 citations
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
1.60
article

Performance Evaluation of Five Different Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Monodisperse Test Aerosols

Dieter Bathen, Christof Asbach, Martin Nothhelfer, Ana Maria Todea
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The performance of five different low-cost particulate matter sensor models has been characterized with monodisperse DEHS particles by comparing particle number and mass concentrations in different size fractions to the results of an optical particle counter (Palas welas) used as reference. Methods The five investigated sensor models are the SDS011 (NovaFitness), SPS30 (Sensirion), NextPM (Groupe Tera), OPC-R2 and OPC-N3 (both Alphasense). To obtain information on the intra-specimen variability, five specimens of each sensor model were tested. Three different parameters were investigated, namely the number and mass-based detection efficiency between 0.15 and 5 μm for different particle concentration levels, accuracy of size fractionation, and dynamic response to rapid concentration changes. Results NextPM and SDS011 were less suitable for detecting DEHS particles than the other models. With the NextPM sensor, the measured number concentrations sometimes deviated by more than a factor of 10 from the reference. The other sensor models have their own advantages and disadvantages, depending on the purpose of the measurement. Compared to the OPC-N3 and OPC-R2, the SPS30 for instance is capable of detecting higher number concentrations, but only with a much lower size resolution than the OPC-N3 or OPC-R2. Conclusions Overall, the experiments have shown that the OPC-R2 and OPC-N3 sensors are the most suited ones for laboratory applications with DEHS-particles at concentrations of < 1500 P/cm 3 . They have a comparably size-independent counting efficiency for d P ≥ 0.5 μm and are able to accurately measure particle number size distributions. They also show the most dynamic response to rapid concentration changes with a t 10-90 time constant of around 1.5 s compared to the other sensors (> 4 s). Graphical Abstract

Aerosol and Air Quality ResearchVol. 25(5)
Institut für Energie- und Umwelttechnik (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.