Benchmarking Optimization Methods Enabling Efficient Designs for Diverse Nanophotonic Applications

Abstract Advances in fabrication processes and materials have driven the demand for intricate nanophotonic designs that enable active, multifunctional, and high‐performance devices. Selecting an appropriate optimization method is crucial, considering the characteristics of both the problem and algorithms, such as the number of design parameters and simulation methods. In this study, nine optimization algorithms are modularized and applied them to six representative nanophotonic problems using rigorous coupled‐wave analysis (RCWA) and scalar diffraction theory. This framework facilitates benchmarking and performance evaluation of optimization methods across diverse problems. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) excels in low‐dimensional cases, while genetic algorithms (GAs) performs better in higher dimensions. For optimizing phase profiles with tens of thousands of variables, automatic differentiation‐based methods are most effective. This research provides a practical guide for selecting optimization methods based on problem characteristics and lays the foundation for modular, scalable inverse design tools in nanophotonics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Optical Materials
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202500195
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Optical Coatings and Gratings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Optimization Methods Enabling Efficient Designs for Diverse Nanophotonic Applications

Junsuk Rho, Chihun Lee
3 citations
Advanced Optical Materials
Optical Coatings and Gratings
1.98
article

Benchmarking Optimization Methods Enabling Efficient Designs for Diverse Nanophotonic Applications

Junsuk Rho, Chihun Lee
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Advances in fabrication processes and materials have driven the demand for intricate nanophotonic designs that enable active, multifunctional, and high‐performance devices. Selecting an appropriate optimization method is crucial, considering the characteristics of both the problem and algorithms, such as the number of design parameters and simulation methods. In this study, nine optimization algorithms are modularized and applied them to six representative nanophotonic problems using rigorous coupled‐wave analysis (RCWA) and scalar diffraction theory. This framework facilitates benchmarking and performance evaluation of optimization methods across diverse problems. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) excels in low‐dimensional cases, while genetic algorithms (GAs) performs better in higher dimensions. For optimizing phase profiles with tens of thousands of variables, automatic differentiation‐based methods are most effective. This research provides a practical guide for selecting optimization methods based on problem characteristics and lays the foundation for modular, scalable inverse design tools in nanophotonics.

Advanced Optical MaterialsVol. 13(17)
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR), Pohang Iron and Steel (South Korea) (KR), Korea Institute of Materials Science (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Optical Coatings and Gratings
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking Optimization Methods Enabling Efficient Designs for Diverse Nanophotonic Applications — Junsuk Rho, Chihun Lee · Advanced Optical Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS