EXPLORING THE ROLE OF QUICK COUNT IN ELECTIONS: BETWEEN TRANSPARENCY AND CONTROVERSY

Quick count is a method of counting election results that is carried out by taking samples of votes from some polling stations (TPS) to predict the final results of the election. Quick counts have become essential in the democratic process, providing fast and accurate preliminary information about election results and serving as a social control tool that prevents fraud. However, the quick count is also not free from controversy. Some parties doubt the accuracy and independence of the survey institutions that conduct the quick count, given the potential for bias and political pressure. In addition, the quick count results that are different from the official results from the KPU (General Election Commission) can trigger tension and distrust among the public. Therefore, survey institutions must maintain integrity and transparency in implementing quick counts to ensure public trust and legitimacy of the election process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Hukum Responsif
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v15i2.9533
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPLORING THE ROLE OF QUICK COUNT IN ELECTIONS: BETWEEN TRANSPARENCY AND CONTROVERSY

Netty Pabiangan, Didi Sukardi, Edy Setiawan
Hukum Responsif
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

EXPLORING THE ROLE OF QUICK COUNT IN ELECTIONS: BETWEEN TRANSPARENCY AND CONTROVERSY

Netty Pabiangan, Didi Sukardi, Edy Setiawan
article en

Abstract

Quick count is a method of counting election results that is carried out by taking samples of votes from some polling stations (TPS) to predict the final results of the election. Quick counts have become essential in the democratic process, providing fast and accurate preliminary information about election results and serving as a social control tool that prevents fraud. However, the quick count is also not free from controversy. Some parties doubt the accuracy and independence of the survey institutions that conduct the quick count, given the potential for bias and political pressure. In addition, the quick count results that are different from the official results from the KPU (General Election Commission) can trigger tension and distrust among the public. Therefore, survey institutions must maintain integrity and transparency in implementing quick counts to ensure public trust and legitimacy of the election process.

Hukum ResponsifVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EXPLORING THE ROLE OF QUICK COUNT IN ELECTIONS: BETWEEN TRANSPARENCY AND CONTROVERSY — Netty Pabiangan, Didi Sukardi, et al. · Hukum Responsif (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS