Open innovation governance for the Big Tech (BT) platform-ecosystems: a multi-level stakeholder framework

Purpose Silicon Valley Big Tech (BT), representing Alphabet, Apple, Meta and Amazon, wields substantial influence over their platform users, leading to calls for more stringent digital regulation. The purpose of this study is to conceptualize “open innovation governance” for the BT platform ecosystems. This involves the balanced use of both incentives and controls to address stakeholder power imbalances at the corporate (BT senior manager), platform (complementor) and ecosystem (end-users) levels to share ecosystem value. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual review methodology systematically examines various academic articles, books and 10 K annual reports on BT firms. This study dissects the business models of each BT firm while drawing on empirical examples from the high-tech sectors to advance general propositions. This research presents a prescriptive open innovation (OI) governance framework based on the literature synthesis. Findings This research advances a “managerial toolkit” leveraging Objectives and Key Results and Key Performance Indicators tied to specific incentives and controls to enable BT senior managers to generate OIs, complementors to absorb and end-users to disseminate open digital platform-ecosystem value. Originality/value This study has implications for both theory and practice. Theoretically, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to conceptualize a prescriptive OI governance framework that BT managers can use to generate shared values. Practically, the conceptual framework has implications for digital policymakers governing BT, representing a middle ground between advocates for breaking up BT platforms and proponents of limited digital regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-08-2024-0185
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open innovation governance for the Big Tech (BT) platform-ecosystems: a multi-level stakeholder framework

Ibrahim Shaikh, Marcel Bogers
1 citations
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Digital Platforms and Economics
2.23
article

Open innovation governance for the Big Tech (BT) platform-ecosystems: a multi-level stakeholder framework

Ibrahim Shaikh, Marcel Bogers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Silicon Valley Big Tech (BT), representing Alphabet, Apple, Meta and Amazon, wields substantial influence over their platform users, leading to calls for more stringent digital regulation. The purpose of this study is to conceptualize “open innovation governance” for the BT platform ecosystems. This involves the balanced use of both incentives and controls to address stakeholder power imbalances at the corporate (BT senior manager), platform (complementor) and ecosystem (end-users) levels to share ecosystem value. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual review methodology systematically examines various academic articles, books and 10 K annual reports on BT firms. This study dissects the business models of each BT firm while drawing on empirical examples from the high-tech sectors to advance general propositions. This research presents a prescriptive open innovation (OI) governance framework based on the literature synthesis. Findings This research advances a “managerial toolkit” leveraging Objectives and Key Results and Key Performance Indicators tied to specific incentives and controls to enable BT senior managers to generate OIs, complementors to absorb and end-users to disseminate open digital platform-ecosystem value. Originality/value This study has implications for both theory and practice. Theoretically, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to conceptualize a prescriptive OI governance framework that BT managers can use to generate shared values. Practically, the conceptual framework has implications for digital policymakers governing BT, representing a middle ground between advocates for breaking up BT platforms and proponents of limited digital regulation.

Digital Policy Regulation and GovernanceVol. 28(2)
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Marist University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Digital Platforms and Economics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.