Knowledge management in the age of generative artificial intelligence – from SECI to GRAI

Purpose Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) models are now able not only to recognize complex patterns from large amounts of input data but also to display them in context. This fact invites a critical analysis of the SECI model and its further applicability as an analytical framework for knowledge generation and transfer in organizations. This conceptual paper aims to take the SECI model with the individual SECI phases and analyze how GenAI changes the assumptions and descriptions of the original SECI framework. More specifically, the aim is to propose a revised SECI framework. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to contribute to theory development of theories present in the literature. More specifically, it seeks to make a conceptual contribution that draws on one of the four types of conceptual contributions proposed by Deborah J. MacInnis, namely, envisioning, and is based on previous literature and the authors’ thoughts and experiences to propose a revised SECI framework called GRAI, which stands for Generative Receptive Artificial Intelligence. Findings A better understanding of the further applicability of the SECI framework that arises with the introduction and application of GenAI models is not only relevant to the existing knowledge management (KM) theory but also to organizations. The proposed revised perspective of the SECI model, summarized in the GRAI framework, reflects the use of GenAI technologies in the corporate environment and thus allows the necessary stimulation of a discussion on how KM in general, and knowledge generation, in particular, will be affected and augmented by AI. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to systematically and comprehensively examine the established SECI framework and its wider applicability in terms of the potential impact of GenAI models on KM practices in organizations. The proposed GRAI framework is seen as a relevant contribution to the further development of KM theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-10-2024-0357
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge management in the age of generative artificial intelligence – from SECI to GRAI

Susanne Durst, Karsten Böhm
14 citations
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
31.17
article

Knowledge management in the age of generative artificial intelligence – from SECI to GRAI

Susanne Durst, Karsten Böhm
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Purpose Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) models are now able not only to recognize complex patterns from large amounts of input data but also to display them in context. This fact invites a critical analysis of the SECI model and its further applicability as an analytical framework for knowledge generation and transfer in organizations. This conceptual paper aims to take the SECI model with the individual SECI phases and analyze how GenAI changes the assumptions and descriptions of the original SECI framework. More specifically, the aim is to propose a revised SECI framework. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to contribute to theory development of theories present in the literature. More specifically, it seeks to make a conceptual contribution that draws on one of the four types of conceptual contributions proposed by Deborah J. MacInnis, namely, envisioning, and is based on previous literature and the authors’ thoughts and experiences to propose a revised SECI framework called GRAI, which stands for Generative Receptive Artificial Intelligence. Findings A better understanding of the further applicability of the SECI framework that arises with the introduction and application of GenAI models is not only relevant to the existing knowledge management (KM) theory but also to organizations. The proposed revised perspective of the SECI model, summarized in the GRAI framework, reflects the use of GenAI technologies in the corporate environment and thus allows the necessary stimulation of a discussion on how KM in general, and knowledge generation, in particular, will be affected and augmented by AI. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to systematically and comprehensively examine the established SECI framework and its wider applicability in terms of the potential impact of GenAI models on KM practices in organizations. The proposed GRAI framework is seen as a relevant contribution to the further development of KM theory.

VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management SystemsVol. 56(1)
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), Reykjavík University (IS), Tallinn University of Applied Sciences (EE), University of Applied Sciences Kufstein (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence
31.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.