Calibration of wavefront aberrations using supervised learning and deep learning for a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor

We evaluate wavefront fitting methods in single-sample and multisample scenarios, focusing on least squares (LSQ), gradient descent, and dynamic hypernetwork approaches. LSQ is a well-established method, whereas gradient descent offers a low-cost, adaptable solution. By contrast, the dynamic hypernetwork achieves the highest precision, with a mean absolute error of 2.9559×10−5λ, significantly lower than the 2.1909×10−4λ obtained by LSQ. In addition, it reduces computation time to 0.0273 ms per sample, outperforming LSQ’s 0.4250 ms, and exhibits superior robustness in the presence of outliers. On the full testing dataset, the dynamic hypernetwork maintains consistent performance, demonstrating its ability to generalize effectively under varying levels of atmospheric turbulence. These results demonstrate that AI-based methods—particularly dynamic hypernetworks—not only address LSQ’s limitations but also enable fast and accurate wavefront fitting, making them promising tools for real-time optical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optical Engineering
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.64.5.053101
Primary Topic
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibration of wavefront aberrations using supervised learning and deep learning for a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor

Joel Herrera Vázquez, Juan José Tapia Armenta, Marco A. Reyna, Eduardo Gerardo Pérez Tijerina et al.
Optical Engineering
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
article

Calibration of wavefront aberrations using supervised learning and deep learning for a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor

Joel Herrera Vázquez, Juan José Tapia Armenta, Marco A. Reyna, Eduardo Gerardo Pérez Tijerina, Carlos Alberto Guerrero Peña
article en

Abstract

We evaluate wavefront fitting methods in single-sample and multisample scenarios, focusing on least squares (LSQ), gradient descent, and dynamic hypernetwork approaches. LSQ is a well-established method, whereas gradient descent offers a low-cost, adaptable solution. By contrast, the dynamic hypernetwork achieves the highest precision, with a mean absolute error of 2.9559×10−5λ, significantly lower than the 2.1909×10−4λ obtained by LSQ. In addition, it reduces computation time to 0.0273 ms per sample, outperforming LSQ’s 0.4250 ms, and exhibits superior robustness in the presence of outliers. On the full testing dataset, the dynamic hypernetwork maintains consistent performance, demonstrating its ability to generalize effectively under varying levels of atmospheric turbulence. These results demonstrate that AI-based methods—particularly dynamic hypernetworks—not only address LSQ’s limitations but also enable fast and accurate wavefront fitting, making them promising tools for real-time optical applications.

Optical EngineeringVol. 64(05)
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Calibration of wavefront aberrations using supervised learning and deep learning for a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor — Joel Herrera Vázquez, Juan José Tapia Armenta, et al. · Optical Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS