On Combining Conventional Point‐To‐Point and Automated Waste Collection Systems

ABSTRACT The global demand for sustainable waste management has spurred initiatives to improve the efficiency of urban waste collection, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of different systems. We analyze a new combined waste collection problem that uses two systems simultaneously: a point‐to‐point system, in which waste is collected using trucks, and an automated system, where waste from inlets is transported through a network of pipes. The resulting combined waste collection problem is a two‐stage decision problem: At the first stage, for each collection point, it must be decided whether it is served by truck or the pneumatic system. At the second stage, a Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) must be solved for the collection points served by truck, and a cost‐minimal tree must be determined for the collection points assigned to the pneumatic system. Both stages and the respective problems are interdependent, making the optimization of the whole system a difficult task. We develop a holistic solution approach based on a set‐partitioning formulation utilizing route and tree variables. Because of the large number of variables, we solve the formulation heuristically using a column‐generation‐based matheuristic. The resulting subproblems are an elementary shortest‐path problem with capacity constraints and a variant of the node‐weighted Steiner tree problem. Our approach is empirically evaluated on two datasets, an extended variant of the well‐known CVRP benchmark and real‐world data from Vienna. The results indicate that the proposed matheuristic can provide high‐quality solutions to realistic instances of the combined waste collection problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Networks
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/net.22283
Primary Topic
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Combining Conventional Point‐To‐Point and Automated Waste Collection Systems

Maryam DehghanChenary, Christian Tilk, Stefan Irnich, Richard F. Hartl
Networks
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
article

On Combining Conventional Point‐To‐Point and Automated Waste Collection Systems

Maryam DehghanChenary, Christian Tilk, Stefan Irnich, Richard F. Hartl
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The global demand for sustainable waste management has spurred initiatives to improve the efficiency of urban waste collection, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of different systems. We analyze a new combined waste collection problem that uses two systems simultaneously: a point‐to‐point system, in which waste is collected using trucks, and an automated system, where waste from inlets is transported through a network of pipes. The resulting combined waste collection problem is a two‐stage decision problem: At the first stage, for each collection point, it must be decided whether it is served by truck or the pneumatic system. At the second stage, a Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) must be solved for the collection points served by truck, and a cost‐minimal tree must be determined for the collection points assigned to the pneumatic system. Both stages and the respective problems are interdependent, making the optimization of the whole system a difficult task. We develop a holistic solution approach based on a set‐partitioning formulation utilizing route and tree variables. Because of the large number of variables, we solve the formulation heuristically using a column‐generation‐based matheuristic. The resulting subproblems are an elementary shortest‐path problem with capacity constraints and a variant of the node‐weighted Steiner tree problem. Our approach is empirically evaluated on two datasets, an extended variant of the well‐known CVRP benchmark and real‐world data from Vienna. The results indicate that the proposed matheuristic can provide high‐quality solutions to realistic instances of the combined waste collection problem.

NetworksVol. 86(2)
University of Vienna (AT), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Combining Conventional Point‐To‐Point and Automated Waste Collection Systems — Maryam DehghanChenary, Christian Tilk, et al. · Networks (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS