Algorithmic Hegemony

This article examines the transformative role of AI-mediated communication systems (AIMCS) in shaping public discourse and political outcomes, with a specific focus on the 2025 German electoral campaign. By integrating insights from sociocybernetics, neurobiology, and anthropology, this study offers a multidisciplinary analysis of how AIMCS have evolved from passive conduits of information into active agents of governance. The article investigates how advanced generative models and engagement-driven algorithms restructure political communication by embedding hegemonic power structures into digital ecosystems. Through empirical analysis—including the case of Elon Musk’s platform “X” and its algorithmic amplification of far-right narratives—the study demonstrates how elite interference strategically manipulates AIMCS to reinforce binary, emotionally charged narratives that narrow public debate and erode democratic deliberation. The findings reveal that AIMCS capitalize on fundamental cognitive predispositions such as heuristic processing and negativity bias to generate recursive feedback loops, which not only stabilize existing ideological biases but also reshape the conditions under which political agency is exercised. This study calls for a critical reassessment of digital governance and the structural design of AIMCS, advocating for mechanisms that promote narrative diversity, epistemic complexity, and reflective dialogue to mitigate the systemic risks posed by algorithmic hegemony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sociocybernetics
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_jos/jos.2025111599
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Hegemony

Klaus Behnam Shad
1 citations
Journal of Sociocybernetics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Algorithmic Hegemony

Klaus Behnam Shad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines the transformative role of AI-mediated communication systems (AIMCS) in shaping public discourse and political outcomes, with a specific focus on the 2025 German electoral campaign. By integrating insights from sociocybernetics, neurobiology, and anthropology, this study offers a multidisciplinary analysis of how AIMCS have evolved from passive conduits of information into active agents of governance. The article investigates how advanced generative models and engagement-driven algorithms restructure political communication by embedding hegemonic power structures into digital ecosystems. Through empirical analysis—including the case of Elon Musk’s platform “X” and its algorithmic amplification of far-right narratives—the study demonstrates how elite interference strategically manipulates AIMCS to reinforce binary, emotionally charged narratives that narrow public debate and erode democratic deliberation. The findings reveal that AIMCS capitalize on fundamental cognitive predispositions such as heuristic processing and negativity bias to generate recursive feedback loops, which not only stabilize existing ideological biases but also reshape the conditions under which political agency is exercised. This study calls for a critical reassessment of digital governance and the structural design of AIMCS, advocating for mechanisms that promote narrative diversity, epistemic complexity, and reflective dialogue to mitigate the systemic risks posed by algorithmic hegemony.

Journal of SociocyberneticsVol. 20(1)
University of Luxembourg (LU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Algorithmic Hegemony — Klaus Behnam Shad · Journal of Sociocybernetics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS