Capture—Incubate—Release: An Animal‐Friendly Approach to Assess Local Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Species Diversity Through Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> Metabarcoding

ABSTRACT Metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples has become an important tool for aquatic biodiversity assessment because it is minimally invasive, time‐efficient, and generates comprehensive taxa lists. Nevertheless, species lists differ noticeably from those obtained via bulk metabarcoding of the local benthic community because of eDNA traces transported in the water column. However, it is important for several assessments to capture local biodiversity signals. Our goal was to test whether we can combine the advantages of both methods, that is, obtaining a local signal and being minimally invasive. Therefore, our developed method includes capturing local benthic invertebrates, incubating them in a water container for eDNA enrichment and analysis, and releasing them back to their habitat. We first quantified eDNA release over time for 10 invertebrate species in a laboratory setting using qPCR. We found that a 5‐min incubation is sufficient to successfully detect 50% of the replicates for six of the 10 species. Three of the species showed a significant increase in eDNA molecules over time. However, the experiment showed a species‐specific eDNA release pattern that was not directly linked to body sclerotization nor biomass. As a second experiment, we sampled bulk samples at three field sites and incubated the bulk samples for 0, 20, 40, and 80 min in containers filled with stream water to compare taxa lists obtained via metabarcoding of bulk and the enriched eDNA samples. Our results showed a much higher overlap between bulk and enriched eDNA metabarcoding (55%–60%) in comparison to reported overlaps between bulk and stream eDNA metabarcoding from other studies (often &lt; 20%). This overlap did not change with incubation time. Thus, our study demonstrates that it is possible to detect most locally occurring species via eDNA metabarcoding after shortly incubating them in water. Therefore, this approach has great potential for point‐sample eDNA analysis of macroinvertebrates without compromising animal welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental DNA
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70112
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capture—Incubate—Release: An Animal‐Friendly Approach to Assess Local Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Species Diversity Through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding

Arne J. Beermann, Florian Leese, Marie‐Thérése Werner, Martina Weiss et al.
4 citations
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
article

Capture—Incubate—Release: An Animal‐Friendly Approach to Assess Local Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Species Diversity Through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding

Arne J. Beermann, Florian Leese, Marie‐Thérése Werner, Martina Weiss, Dominik Buchner, Mandy Sander
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Metabarcoding of environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples has become an important tool for aquatic biodiversity assessment because it is minimally invasive, time‐efficient, and generates comprehensive taxa lists. Nevertheless, species lists differ noticeably from those obtained via bulk metabarcoding of the local benthic community because of eDNA traces transported in the water column. However, it is important for several assessments to capture local biodiversity signals. Our goal was to test whether we can combine the advantages of both methods, that is, obtaining a local signal and being minimally invasive. Therefore, our developed method includes capturing local benthic invertebrates, incubating them in a water container for eDNA enrichment and analysis, and releasing them back to their habitat. We first quantified eDNA release over time for 10 invertebrate species in a laboratory setting using qPCR. We found that a 5‐min incubation is sufficient to successfully detect 50% of the replicates for six of the 10 species. Three of the species showed a significant increase in eDNA molecules over time. However, the experiment showed a species‐specific eDNA release pattern that was not directly linked to body sclerotization nor biomass. As a second experiment, we sampled bulk samples at three field sites and incubated the bulk samples for 0, 20, 40, and 80 min in containers filled with stream water to compare taxa lists obtained via metabarcoding of bulk and the enriched eDNA samples. Our results showed a much higher overlap between bulk and enriched eDNA metabarcoding (55%–60%) in comparison to reported overlaps between bulk and stream eDNA metabarcoding from other studies (often &lt; 20%). This overlap did not change with incubation time. Thus, our study demonstrates that it is possible to detect most locally occurring species via eDNA metabarcoding after shortly incubating them in water. Therefore, this approach has great potential for point‐sample eDNA analysis of macroinvertebrates without compromising animal welfare.

Environmental DNAVol. 7(3)
University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.