Evaluation the findings of WHO rapid assistive technology assessment (rATA) in Iraq: A field-based survey

The objective of this population-based study was to assess the use, sources, payers, barriers, need, and unmet need of assistive products (AP) in the population of Iraq using the Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) survey. The survey included a representative national sample from six governorates, including 36 cities/districts that cover all the country. In total 12,021 respondents' data were included in the data analysis. A total, of 16.4% of the sample reported use of AP, and 22.8% reported being in need of AP. Children and adolescents (≤17 years), seniors (≥80 years), and people living in rural areas had lower access to APs. The main sources of funding were out-of-pocket (57.6%), followed by friends and family (31.2%), government (10.1%), and NGOs (4.8%). Furthermore, 58%, 27.3% and 12.2% APs were obtained from the private sector, friends and family, and the government, respectively. The main barriers facing people in need to get APs were inability to afford (43.6%), no support (22.3%), unavailability of APs (11.5%), stigma (4.6%), and no time available (3.5%). It is the government's responsibility to provide AP, in addition to suitable environments (sidewalks, transportation, and public buildings) that are friendly to people with wheelchairs and crutches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assistive Technology
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2496481
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation the findings of WHO rapid assistive technology assessment (rATA) in Iraq: A field-based survey

M. A. Eissa, Ali Azeez Al‐Jumaili, Kherun Nita Ali, Mohamad Wehbi et al.
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Evaluation the findings of WHO rapid assistive technology assessment (rATA) in Iraq: A field-based survey

M. A. Eissa, Ali Azeez Al‐Jumaili, Kherun Nita Ali, Mohamad Wehbi, Zinah E. Nooruldeen, Hazem Sakr, Wei Zhang, Abdullah S. Ibrahim, Manal Mustafa, Aderemi Azeez, Ammar Al-Ameri, Naseem Jaafar Sadeq, Houda Langar, Aamr Bebany, Raoof Tariq Raoof
article en

Abstract

The objective of this population-based study was to assess the use, sources, payers, barriers, need, and unmet need of assistive products (AP) in the population of Iraq using the Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) survey. The survey included a representative national sample from six governorates, including 36 cities/districts that cover all the country. In total 12,021 respondents' data were included in the data analysis. A total, of 16.4% of the sample reported use of AP, and 22.8% reported being in need of AP. Children and adolescents (≤17 years), seniors (≥80 years), and people living in rural areas had lower access to APs. The main sources of funding were out-of-pocket (57.6%), followed by friends and family (31.2%), government (10.1%), and NGOs (4.8%). Furthermore, 58%, 27.3% and 12.2% APs were obtained from the private sector, friends and family, and the government, respectively. The main barriers facing people in need to get APs were inability to afford (43.6%), no support (22.3%), unavailability of APs (11.5%), stigma (4.6%), and no time available (3.5%). It is the government's responsibility to provide AP, in addition to suitable environments (sidewalks, transportation, and public buildings) that are friendly to people with wheelchairs and crutches.

Assistive TechnologyVol. 37(5)
World Health Organization - Pakistan (PK), University of Baghdad (IQ), Ministry of Health (IQ), World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.