Foreground signals minimally affect inference of high-mass binary black holes in next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

Next-generation gravitational-wave observatories are expected to detect over a thousand compact binary coalescence signals daily, with some lasting from minutes to hours. Consequently, multiple signals will overlap in the time-frequency plane, generating a foreground noise that predominantly affects the low-frequency range, where binary neutron star inspiral evolution is gradual. This study investigates the impact of such foreground noise on parameter estimation for short-duration binary black hole signals, particularly those with high detector-frame masses and/or located at large redshifts. Our results show a reduction in detection sensitivity by approximately 25% when the noise power spectrum deviates by up to 50% from Gaussian noise due to foreground contamination. Despite this, using standard parameter estimation techniques without subtracting overlapping signals, we find that foreground noise has minimal impact, primarily affecting precision. These findings suggest that even in the presence of substantial foreground noise, global-fit techniques, and/or signal subtraction will not be necessary for unbiased recovery of system parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.104013
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foreground signals minimally affect inference of high-mass binary black holes in next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

Ish Gupta, Koustav Chandra, B. S. Sathyaprakash
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
article

Foreground signals minimally affect inference of high-mass binary black holes in next-generation gravitational-wave detectors

Ish Gupta, Koustav Chandra, B. S. Sathyaprakash
article en

Abstract

Next-generation gravitational-wave observatories are expected to detect over a thousand compact binary coalescence signals daily, with some lasting from minutes to hours. Consequently, multiple signals will overlap in the time-frequency plane, generating a foreground noise that predominantly affects the low-frequency range, where binary neutron star inspiral evolution is gradual. This study investigates the impact of such foreground noise on parameter estimation for short-duration binary black hole signals, particularly those with high detector-frame masses and/or located at large redshifts. Our results show a reduction in detection sensitivity by approximately 25% when the noise power spectrum deviates by up to 50% from Gaussian noise due to foreground contamination. Despite this, using standard parameter estimation techniques without subtracting overlapping signals, we find that foreground noise has minimal impact, primarily affecting precision. These findings suggest that even in the presence of substantial foreground noise, global-fit techniques, and/or signal subtraction will not be necessary for unbiased recovery of system parameters.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(10)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Foreground signals minimally affect inference of high-mass binary black holes in next-generation gravitational-wave detectors — Ish Gupta, Koustav Chandra, et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS