Pluralism and Normativity in Environmental and Sustainability Education

Among the three traditions in environmental and sustainability education (ESE) identified as ‘fact-based’, ‘normative’ and ‘pluralist’, the favoured approach for researchers using this typology is clearly pluralism. Arguments in support of pluralism include its democratic qualities, acknowledgement of complexity and commitment to the ethos of education itself. This theoretical study traces how the pluralist approach to ESE was built toward an increasingly dominant position, with Sweden as an epicentre, and questions some of the epistemological moves and justifications along the way. Special attention is given to how normativity, as the primary contrast to pluralism, is portrayed in shifting and sometimes questionable ways. Although pluralism clearly deserves a place in ESE, the article argues for a more nuanced representation of pluralism as one of several democratic teaching approaches, including more approving notions of normativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Speki Nordic Philosophy and Education Review
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/speki.11981
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pluralism and Normativity in Environmental and Sustainability Education

Ingerid S. Straume
Speki Nordic Philosophy and Education Review
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Pluralism and Normativity in Environmental and Sustainability Education

Ingerid S. Straume
article en

Abstract

Among the three traditions in environmental and sustainability education (ESE) identified as ‘fact-based’, ‘normative’ and ‘pluralist’, the favoured approach for researchers using this typology is clearly pluralism. Arguments in support of pluralism include its democratic qualities, acknowledgement of complexity and commitment to the ethos of education itself. This theoretical study traces how the pluralist approach to ESE was built toward an increasingly dominant position, with Sweden as an epicentre, and questions some of the epistemological moves and justifications along the way. Special attention is given to how normativity, as the primary contrast to pluralism, is portrayed in shifting and sometimes questionable ways. Although pluralism clearly deserves a place in ESE, the article argues for a more nuanced representation of pluralism as one of several democratic teaching approaches, including more approving notions of normativity.

Speki Nordic Philosophy and Education ReviewVol. 2(1)
Sørlandet Sykehus (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pluralism and Normativity in Environmental and Sustainability Education — Ingerid S. Straume · Speki Nordic Philosophy and Education Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS