Social media use in adolescents with and without mental health conditions

Concerns about the relationship between social media use and adolescent mental health are growing, yet few studies focus on adolescents with clinical-level mental health symptoms. This limits our understanding of how social media use varies across mental health profiles. In this Registered Report, we analyse nationally representative UK data (N = 3,340, aged 11-19 years) including diagnostic assessments by clinical raters alongside quantitative and qualitative social media measures. As hypothesized, adolescents with mental health conditions reported spending more time on social media and were less happy about the number of online friends than adolescents without conditions. We also found hypothesized differences in social media use by condition type: adolescents with internalizing conditions reported spending more time on social media, engaging in more social comparison and experiencing greater impact of feedback on mood, alongside lower happiness about the number of online friends and lower honest self-disclosure. In contrast, those with externalizing conditions only reported higher time spent. These findings emphasize the need to consider diverse adolescent mental health profiles in policy and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02134-4
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
117.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social media use in adolescents with and without mental health conditions

Andrew K Przybylski, Amy Orben, Luisa Fassi, Amanda M Ferguson et al.
29 citations
Nature Human Behaviour
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
117.64
article

Social media use in adolescents with and without mental health conditions

Andrew K Przybylski, Amy Orben, Luisa Fassi, Amanda M Ferguson, Tamsin Jane Ford
article en
29 citations

Abstract

Concerns about the relationship between social media use and adolescent mental health are growing, yet few studies focus on adolescents with clinical-level mental health symptoms. This limits our understanding of how social media use varies across mental health profiles. In this Registered Report, we analyse nationally representative UK data (N = 3,340, aged 11-19 years) including diagnostic assessments by clinical raters alongside quantitative and qualitative social media measures. As hypothesized, adolescents with mental health conditions reported spending more time on social media and were less happy about the number of online friends than adolescents without conditions. We also found hypothesized differences in social media use by condition type: adolescents with internalizing conditions reported spending more time on social media, engaging in more social comparison and experiencing greater impact of feedback on mood, alongside lower happiness about the number of online friends and lower honest self-disclosure. In contrast, those with externalizing conditions only reported higher time spent. These findings emphasize the need to consider diverse adolescent mental health profiles in policy and clinical practice.

Nature Human BehaviourVol. 9(6)
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Jacobs Foundation, Vetenskapsrådet, Huo Family Foundation, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Programme Grants for Applied Research, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
117.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.