Pharmacoeconomic analysis of lanreotide and prolonged-release octreotide in first- and second-line therapy of acromegaly

Background . Pharmacoeconomic aspects of somatostatin analogues remain an important topic for discussion. Despite the higher cost of lanreotide compared to octreotide, the former may have an advantage in terms of administration convenience and high efficacy. Objective : to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the use of lanreotide and prolonged-release octreotide in adult patients with acromegaly. Material and methods . A cost model for the treatment of acromegaly patients during the period of 2.5 years was developed, accounting for direct medical costs for drugs and surgical intervention. A pharmacoeconomic study by the CEA method and a sensitivity analysis of the model were performed. Results . In real clinical practice of acromegaly treatment, lanreotide enables a more effective remission compared to prolonged-release octreotide (51% vs 24%) under a comparable safety profile. The direct medical costs for a 2.5-year course of lanreotide amounted to 1,466,669.49 rubles per patient with acromegaly compared to 908,272.53 rubles for a course of prolonged-release octreotide. Considering the difference in the amount of 558,096.79 rubles, the course of lanreotide was found to be 25% more expensive. According to CEA results, the cost of achieving remission in 1 patient with acromegaly with lanreotide and prolonged-release octreotide was equal to 2,415,036.25 and 3,676,115.43 rubles, respectively. Therefore, over the period of 2.5 years, the cost saving amounted to 1,261,079.17 rubles (52%). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the initial model against an increase in the price of lanreotide up to 64%, an increase in the frequency of surgery in patients receiving lanreotide up to 302%, and a decrease in the frequency of remissions in patients receiving lanreotide up to 35%. Conclusion . The use of lanreotide in adult patients with acromegaly is a clinically and cost-effective approach in the context of the Russian healthcare system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2025.306
Primary Topic
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of lanreotide and prolonged-release octreotide in first- and second-line therapy of acromegaly

И. С. Крысанов, Е. В. Макарова, Д. В. Куркин, V. Yu. Ermakova
FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
article

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of lanreotide and prolonged-release octreotide in first- and second-line therapy of acromegaly

И. С. Крысанов, Е. В. Макарова, Д. В. Куркин, V. Yu. Ermakova
article en

Abstract

Background . Pharmacoeconomic aspects of somatostatin analogues remain an important topic for discussion. Despite the higher cost of lanreotide compared to octreotide, the former may have an advantage in terms of administration convenience and high efficacy. Objective : to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the use of lanreotide and prolonged-release octreotide in adult patients with acromegaly. Material and methods . A cost model for the treatment of acromegaly patients during the period of 2.5 years was developed, accounting for direct medical costs for drugs and surgical intervention. A pharmacoeconomic study by the CEA method and a sensitivity analysis of the model were performed. Results . In real clinical practice of acromegaly treatment, lanreotide enables a more effective remission compared to prolonged-release octreotide (51% vs 24%) under a comparable safety profile. The direct medical costs for a 2.5-year course of lanreotide amounted to 1,466,669.49 rubles per patient with acromegaly compared to 908,272.53 rubles for a course of prolonged-release octreotide. Considering the difference in the amount of 558,096.79 rubles, the course of lanreotide was found to be 25% more expensive. According to CEA results, the cost of achieving remission in 1 patient with acromegaly with lanreotide and prolonged-release octreotide was equal to 2,415,036.25 and 3,676,115.43 rubles, respectively. Therefore, over the period of 2.5 years, the cost saving amounted to 1,261,079.17 rubles (52%). The sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the initial model against an increase in the price of lanreotide up to 64%, an increase in the frequency of surgery in patients receiving lanreotide up to 302%, and a decrease in the frequency of remissions in patients receiving lanreotide up to 35%. Conclusion . The use of lanreotide in adult patients with acromegaly is a clinically and cost-effective approach in the context of the Russian healthcare system.

FARMAKOEKONOMIKA Modern Pharmacoeconomics and PharmacoepidemiologyVol. 18(1)
Sechenov University (RU), Moscow State University of Food Production (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.