Hydrometallurgical Recycling of Lithium from the Flue Dust Generated During Pyrometallurgical Processing of LIB Material: A Comparative Analysis of Carbonated and Limewater Leaching

Abstract The increasing availability of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), which are rich in valuable metals such as nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), and lithium (Li), makes them important secondary sources for metal extraction. This study focused on the recovery of Li from a flue dust generated during pyrometallurgical processing of NMC 622 battery material, where Li was present as Li 2 CO 3 and LiF along with various impurities. To selectively extract Li, the flue dust was subjected to leaching with carbonated and limewater under varying temperature and S/L (solid/liquid) ratio. The leachates and leach residues were analyzed to determine Li recovery, co-leached impurities, and to identify possible factors limiting recovery. Leaching with carbonated water at an S/L ratio of 0.05 g/ml, 50 °C and pH of 7.5 resulted in a 70% recovery of Li over 60 min of leaching time, which reduced at higher S/L ratio and temperature. In contrast, when leaching with limewater at 75 °C and S/L ratio of 0.05 g/ml, 77% Li recovery was achieved within 10 min. During these conditions, the pH reached 10. SEM and XRD analysis revealed a CaCO 3 precipitate such as calcite, aragonite, and vaterite in varying proportions, causing surface passivation and inhibition of the leaching reaction. Leaching in limewater not only yielded higher Li recovery but also resulted in lower concentration of co-leached impurities (sodium, potassium, aluminum, and zinc), as compared to carbonated water leaching. However, the impurity levels remained high, requiring further purification and separation to produce battery-grade LiOH·H 2 O. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-025-01101-7
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrometallurgical Recycling of Lithium from the Flue Dust Generated During Pyrometallurgical Processing of LIB Material: A Comparative Analysis of Carbonated and Limewater Leaching

Faizan Muneer, Lena Sundqvist-Öqvist, Anton Andersson, Fredrik Engström et al.
4 citations
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.85
article

Hydrometallurgical Recycling of Lithium from the Flue Dust Generated During Pyrometallurgical Processing of LIB Material: A Comparative Analysis of Carbonated and Limewater Leaching

Faizan Muneer, Lena Sundqvist-Öqvist, Anton Andersson, Fredrik Engström, Ida Strandkvist
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The increasing availability of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), which are rich in valuable metals such as nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), and lithium (Li), makes them important secondary sources for metal extraction. This study focused on the recovery of Li from a flue dust generated during pyrometallurgical processing of NMC 622 battery material, where Li was present as Li 2 CO 3 and LiF along with various impurities. To selectively extract Li, the flue dust was subjected to leaching with carbonated and limewater under varying temperature and S/L (solid/liquid) ratio. The leachates and leach residues were analyzed to determine Li recovery, co-leached impurities, and to identify possible factors limiting recovery. Leaching with carbonated water at an S/L ratio of 0.05 g/ml, 50 °C and pH of 7.5 resulted in a 70% recovery of Li over 60 min of leaching time, which reduced at higher S/L ratio and temperature. In contrast, when leaching with limewater at 75 °C and S/L ratio of 0.05 g/ml, 77% Li recovery was achieved within 10 min. During these conditions, the pH reached 10. SEM and XRD analysis revealed a CaCO 3 precipitate such as calcite, aragonite, and vaterite in varying proportions, causing surface passivation and inhibition of the leaching reaction. Leaching in limewater not only yielded higher Li recovery but also resulted in lower concentration of co-leached impurities (sodium, potassium, aluminum, and zinc), as compared to carbonated water leaching. However, the impurity levels remained high, requiring further purification and separation to produce battery-grade LiOH·H 2 O. Graphical Abstract

Journal of Sustainable MetallurgyVol. 11(2)
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Energimyndigheten, Centre of Advanced Mining and Metallurgy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hydrometallurgical Recycling of Lithium from the Flue Dust Generated During Pyrometallurgical Processing of LIB Material: A Comparative Analysis of Carbonated and Limewater Leaching — Faizan Muneer, Lena Sundqvist-Öqvist, et al. · Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS