“Klio-72” as a personalization of intergenerational memory in Yu.V. Trifonov’s novel “Impatience”

In the narrative structure of the novel “Impatience”, dedicated to the “People’s Will” organization, the Soviet writer Yu.V. Trifonov reflects the dynamics of intergenerational memory and oblivion, described later by the researcher of memorial history Aleida Assman through the categories of “archive”, “selective memory”, “obsolescence”, etc. The main part of the novel is a reflection of the consciousness of Andrei Zhelyabov, but the text also contains evidence about him from other characters, written in the first person and designated as “Voices”, attributed to other time layers. A more unexpected narrative authority is introduced in the chapters of “Klio-72”, where the voice of history is heard. Both the voices of contemporaries and “Klio-72” in the artistic world of the novel cannot be identified with the document, have their own subjectivity and enter into polemics with each other and with the position of the hero. This polemic and the complex artistic meaning it creates will be the subject of our attention in this article.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Semiotic studies
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2025-5-1-38-45
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Klio-72” as a personalization of intergenerational memory in Yu.V. Trifonov’s novel “Impatience”

Elena Sergeeva, Kseniya A. Sundukova
Semiotic studies
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

“Klio-72” as a personalization of intergenerational memory in Yu.V. Trifonov’s novel “Impatience”

Elena Sergeeva, Kseniya A. Sundukova
article en

Abstract

In the narrative structure of the novel “Impatience”, dedicated to the “People’s Will” organization, the Soviet writer Yu.V. Trifonov reflects the dynamics of intergenerational memory and oblivion, described later by the researcher of memorial history Aleida Assman through the categories of “archive”, “selective memory”, “obsolescence”, etc. The main part of the novel is a reflection of the consciousness of Andrei Zhelyabov, but the text also contains evidence about him from other characters, written in the first person and designated as “Voices”, attributed to other time layers. A more unexpected narrative authority is introduced in the chapters of “Klio-72”, where the voice of history is heard. Both the voices of contemporaries and “Klio-72” in the artistic world of the novel cannot be identified with the document, have their own subjectivity and enter into polemics with each other and with the position of the hero. This polemic and the complex artistic meaning it creates will be the subject of our attention in this article.

Semiotic studiesVol. 5(1)
Samara National Research University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.