The Problem of Meaning in the Semiotics of Money

the article summarizes the main approaches to solving the problem of the meaning of money. The semiotics of money is considered in the context of its connection with natural language and in the context of its existence as a cultural symbol. The aim of the work is to find grounds for resolving the contradiction in the theory of the meaning of money. Firstly, in the classical interpretation, the meaning of money is all objects and actions that have quantitative value. Secondly, the modern virtual functioning of money implies the idea that it is a simulacrum, an unbacked and self-referential sign. Thus, the meaning of money is indicated in focus from nothing to everything. The research methodology is based on the principles of pragmatic semiotics. In accordance with these principles, it is necessary to distinguish three levels of the semiosis of money: semantics, pragmatics and syntactics. The article shows that the two extreme approaches outlined reduce the semantics of money to either the syntactic or the pragmatic aspect. Both approaches contain the idea of a financial world conceptualized in Platonic terms. The author attempts to substantiate a synthetic approach, within which money is not self-referent, but at the same time does not refer to objective reality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Semiotic studies
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2025-5-1-16-22
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Problem of Meaning in the Semiotics of Money

Антон Павлович Никитин
Semiotic studies
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

The Problem of Meaning in the Semiotics of Money

Антон Павлович Никитин
article en

Abstract

the article summarizes the main approaches to solving the problem of the meaning of money. The semiotics of money is considered in the context of its connection with natural language and in the context of its existence as a cultural symbol. The aim of the work is to find grounds for resolving the contradiction in the theory of the meaning of money. Firstly, in the classical interpretation, the meaning of money is all objects and actions that have quantitative value. Secondly, the modern virtual functioning of money implies the idea that it is a simulacrum, an unbacked and self-referential sign. Thus, the meaning of money is indicated in focus from nothing to everything. The research methodology is based on the principles of pragmatic semiotics. In accordance with these principles, it is necessary to distinguish three levels of the semiosis of money: semantics, pragmatics and syntactics. The article shows that the two extreme approaches outlined reduce the semantics of money to either the syntactic or the pragmatic aspect. Both approaches contain the idea of a financial world conceptualized in Platonic terms. The author attempts to substantiate a synthetic approach, within which money is not self-referent, but at the same time does not refer to objective reality.

Semiotic studiesVol. 5(1)
Katanov Khakass State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Problem of Meaning in the Semiotics of Money — Антон Павлович Никитин · Semiotic studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS