Evaluation of the relationship between the surface hardness of magmatic building blocks and uniaxial compressive strength values with regression analysis and artificial neural networks

Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) values of rocks are the most important input parameter in rock mechanics and engineering applications. This parameter can be determined by laboratory tests and indirect methods. This study aimed to predict the UCS value with two different non-destructive testing techniques. To this end, the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and the values of Leeb hardness (HL) with low application energy and Schmidt hammer rebound hardness (SHR) with high application energy, which are among non-destructive testing techniques, of 95 different magmatic rocks (plutonic, volcanic, and pyroclastic) were determined. Simple regression (SR), multiple regression (MR), and artificial neural network (ANN) methods were employed to predict the UCS value. The models obtained using these methods were compared with each other. It was revealed that the model developed by ANN had the highest correlation number.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13168/agg.2025.0014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the relationship between the surface hardness of magmatic building blocks and uniaxial compressive strength values with regression analysis and artificial neural networks

İsmail İnce
1 citations
Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
0.95
article

Evaluation of the relationship between the surface hardness of magmatic building blocks and uniaxial compressive strength values with regression analysis and artificial neural networks

İsmail İnce
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) values of rocks are the most important input parameter in rock mechanics and engineering applications. This parameter can be determined by laboratory tests and indirect methods. This study aimed to predict the UCS value with two different non-destructive testing techniques. To this end, the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and the values of Leeb hardness (HL) with low application energy and Schmidt hammer rebound hardness (SHR) with high application energy, which are among non-destructive testing techniques, of 95 different magmatic rocks (plutonic, volcanic, and pyroclastic) were determined. Simple regression (SR), multiple regression (MR), and artificial neural network (ANN) methods were employed to predict the UCS value. The models obtained using these methods were compared with each other. It was revealed that the model developed by ANN had the highest correlation number.

Acta Geodynamica et GeomaterialiaVol. 22(2)
Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.