Assessing Creep–Fatigue Interactions in Wrought and LP-DED-Processed 316 Stainless Steel

Abstract This study examines the low-cycle fatigue (LCF) and creep–fatigue (CF) behavior of wrought 316L and 316H stainless steels to develop acceptance criteria for accelerated testing of additively manufactured (AM) stainless steels. New LCF and CF data were generated between 550 and 700 °C, focusing on the impact of temperature, control mode, and hold time on fatigue life. Life assessment methods, including time fraction (TF), ductility exhaustion (DE), and stress-modified DE (SMDE), were evaluated for their applicability to nuclear code cases. Results highlight that conventional accelerated CF tests often lead to fatigue-dominated failures due to insufficient hold times. DE and SMDE models correlated more effectively with experimental data than TF, particularly when non-damaging viscous strains were excluded. Testing laser powder-directed energy deposition (LP-DED) 316H revealed non-conservative life predictions across all models, contrasting with the conservative predictions for wrought 316L and 316H, despite comparable LCF and creep properties. These findings underscore the need to refine accelerated CF test protocols to better capture damage mechanisms in AM materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068571
Citations
1
Primary Topic
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Creep–Fatigue Interactions in Wrought and LP-DED-Processed 316 Stainless Steel

Alexander N. Caputo, John Shingledecker, Richard W. Neu, Alex Bridges et al.
1 citations
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
0.71
article

Assessing Creep–Fatigue Interactions in Wrought and LP-DED-Processed 316 Stainless Steel

Alexander N. Caputo, John Shingledecker, Richard W. Neu, Alex Bridges, Youta Kashiwa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the low-cycle fatigue (LCF) and creep–fatigue (CF) behavior of wrought 316L and 316H stainless steels to develop acceptance criteria for accelerated testing of additively manufactured (AM) stainless steels. New LCF and CF data were generated between 550 and 700 °C, focusing on the impact of temperature, control mode, and hold time on fatigue life. Life assessment methods, including time fraction (TF), ductility exhaustion (DE), and stress-modified DE (SMDE), were evaluated for their applicability to nuclear code cases. Results highlight that conventional accelerated CF tests often lead to fatigue-dominated failures due to insufficient hold times. DE and SMDE models correlated more effectively with experimental data than TF, particularly when non-damaging viscous strains were excluded. Testing laser powder-directed energy deposition (LP-DED) 316H revealed non-conservative life predictions across all models, contrasting with the conservative predictions for wrought 316L and 316H, despite comparable LCF and creep properties. These findings underscore the need to refine accelerated CF test protocols to better capture damage mechanisms in AM materials.

Journal of Engineering Materials and TechnologyVol. 147(4)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Electric Power Research Institute (US), Woodruff Health Sciences Center (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Purdue University, Auburn University, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nuclear Energy University Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.