Abortion in the Age of AI

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, issued in June 2022 by the U.S. Supreme Court, overturned the Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) rulings on the grounds that the Constitution makes no reference to abortion and that no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision. This decision has had, however, effects beyond U.S. borders. Furthermore, its impact is felt in the exercise of rights: the ruling has reopened a repressive framework that positions women’s bodies as public property. The Dobbs ruling, by returning the issue of abortion “to the People and their elected representatives”, has given individual states the freedom to implement repressive criminal policies, reinforced by digital policies that restrict access to online information and encourage the digital surveillance of women through the massive collection of their intimate data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
McGill Law Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/law.v69i4.1683
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abortion in the Age of AI

Céline Castets-Renard, Caroline Lequesne
1 citations
McGill Law Journal
Reproductive Health and Technologies
0.54
article

Abortion in the Age of AI

Céline Castets-Renard, Caroline Lequesne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, issued in June 2022 by the U.S. Supreme Court, overturned the Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) rulings on the grounds that the Constitution makes no reference to abortion and that no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision. This decision has had, however, effects beyond U.S. borders. Furthermore, its impact is felt in the exercise of rights: the ruling has reopened a repressive framework that positions women’s bodies as public property. The Dobbs ruling, by returning the issue of abortion “to the People and their elected representatives”, has given individual states the freedom to implement repressive criminal policies, reinforced by digital policies that restrict access to online information and encourage the digital surveillance of women through the massive collection of their intimate data.

McGill Law JournalVol. 69(4)
University of Ottawa (CA), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.