Confronting the Viability of “Music for All” in the Face of School Privatization Threats

Music education has been present in public schools in one formal capacity or another for nearly 200 years, and the vitality of traditional public schools is crucial for ensuring “music for all.” In this article, we describe (a) the socio-ideological and economic incentives that motivate the school privatization movement and (b) how school privatization efforts have gained momentum since the civil rights era and the emergence of the contemporary notion of “school choice.” We then explain the typical strategies some legislators and critics tend to use to undermine and disparage public schools. Last, we suggest a variety of steps public school music teachers can take to become informed of their local political realities and work to minimize the potential damage to their local public school institutions because of privatization. Ultimately, we challenge music teachers to help others remember that public education is, indeed, a “public good” rather than a private commodity and that schooling is first and foremost about providing for children rather than earning profits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Music Educators Journal
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321251330201
Primary Topic
Diverse Music Education Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confronting the Viability of “Music for All” in the Face of School Privatization Threats

Peter Miksza, Keri Miksza
Music Educators Journal
Diverse Music Education Insights
article

Confronting the Viability of “Music for All” in the Face of School Privatization Threats

Peter Miksza, Keri Miksza
article en

Abstract

Music education has been present in public schools in one formal capacity or another for nearly 200 years, and the vitality of traditional public schools is crucial for ensuring “music for all.” In this article, we describe (a) the socio-ideological and economic incentives that motivate the school privatization movement and (b) how school privatization efforts have gained momentum since the civil rights era and the emergence of the contemporary notion of “school choice.” We then explain the typical strategies some legislators and critics tend to use to undermine and disparage public schools. Last, we suggest a variety of steps public school music teachers can take to become informed of their local political realities and work to minimize the potential damage to their local public school institutions because of privatization. Ultimately, we challenge music teachers to help others remember that public education is, indeed, a “public good” rather than a private commodity and that schooling is first and foremost about providing for children rather than earning profits.

Music Educators JournalVol. 111(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Diverse Music Education Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Confronting the Viability of “Music for All” in the Face of School Privatization Threats — Peter Miksza, Keri Miksza · Music Educators Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS