LLM4Rerank: LLM-based Auto-Reranking Framework for Recommendations

Reranking is significant for recommender systems due to its pivotal role in refining recommendation results. Numerous reranking models have emerged to meet diverse reranking requirements in practical applications, which not only prioritize accuracy but also consider additional aspects such as diversity and fairness. However, most of the existing models struggle to strike a harmonious balance between these diverse aspects at the model level. Additionally, the scalability and personalization of these models are often limited by their complexity and a lack of attention to the varying importance of different aspects in diverse reranking scenarios. To address these issues, we propose LLM4Rerank, a comprehensive LLM-based reranking framework designed to bridge the gap between various reranking aspects while ensuring scalability and personalized performance. Specifically, we abstract different aspects into distinct nodes and construct a fully connected graph for LLM to automatically consider aspects like accuracy, diversity, fairness, and more, all in a coherent Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process. To further enhance personalization during reranking, we facilitate a customizable input mechanism that allows fine-tuning of LLM's focus on different aspects according to specific reranking needs. Experimental results on three widely used public datasets demonstrate that LLM4Rerank outperforms existing state-of-the-art reranking models across multiple aspects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696410.3714922
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLM4Rerank: LLM-based Auto-Reranking Framework for Recommendations

Huifeng Guo, Jingtong Gao, Yichao Wang, Ruiming Tang et al.
8 citations
Recommender Systems and Techniques
25.97
article

LLM4Rerank: LLM-based Auto-Reranking Framework for Recommendations

Huifeng Guo, Jingtong Gao, Yichao Wang, Ruiming Tang, Wanyu Wang, Xiangyang Li, Bo Chen, Xiangyu Zhao, Weiwen Liu
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Reranking is significant for recommender systems due to its pivotal role in refining recommendation results. Numerous reranking models have emerged to meet diverse reranking requirements in practical applications, which not only prioritize accuracy but also consider additional aspects such as diversity and fairness. However, most of the existing models struggle to strike a harmonious balance between these diverse aspects at the model level. Additionally, the scalability and personalization of these models are often limited by their complexity and a lack of attention to the varying importance of different aspects in diverse reranking scenarios. To address these issues, we propose LLM4Rerank, a comprehensive LLM-based reranking framework designed to bridge the gap between various reranking aspects while ensuring scalability and personalized performance. Specifically, we abstract different aspects into distinct nodes and construct a fully connected graph for LLM to automatically consider aspects like accuracy, diversity, fairness, and more, all in a coherent Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process. To further enhance personalization during reranking, we facilitate a customizable input mechanism that allows fine-tuning of LLM's focus on different aspects according to specific reranking needs. Experimental results on three widely used public datasets demonstrate that LLM4Rerank outperforms existing state-of-the-art reranking models across multiple aspects.

City University of Hong Kong (HK), Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
Impact Fund, City University of Hong Kong, Aromatic Plant Research Center, Innovation and Technology Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
25.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.