ANTICIPATED IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL REACTIVE MATERIALS ON A WARHEADS IM

Structural reactive materials have been identified as feasible technology to improve a warhead’s lethality by air blast/bubble energy, behind armor effects, or as small sized initiation elements. Laboratory scale sensitivity test data reveal that many SRM formulations show a much higher shock and thermal insensitivity level compared to the well-known energetic materials TNT and HMX. Even though few data were identified in literature, estimation of IM test results is possible by generic reaction models. Based on the NATO AOP-39 framework, the IM characteristics of non-mitigated SRM warheads are anticipated to be between Type I (SR/SJ) and Type III (FH/SH/BI/FI), which is significantly worse than the current state of the art (i.e. Type IV – VI). With IM SRM compositions and applied venting and shock mitigation, response levels of Type III for SR and SJ tests seem achievable and even better results of Type IV-V for FH/SH/BI/FI.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12783/ballistics25/37157
Primary Topic
Energetic Materials and Combustion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANTICIPATED IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL REACTIVE MATERIALS ON A WARHEADS IM

Jakob A. Breiner, Kevin M. Jaansalu
Energetic Materials and Combustion
article

ANTICIPATED IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL REACTIVE MATERIALS ON A WARHEADS IM

Jakob A. Breiner, Kevin M. Jaansalu
article en

Abstract

Structural reactive materials have been identified as feasible technology to improve a warhead’s lethality by air blast/bubble energy, behind armor effects, or as small sized initiation elements. Laboratory scale sensitivity test data reveal that many SRM formulations show a much higher shock and thermal insensitivity level compared to the well-known energetic materials TNT and HMX. Even though few data were identified in literature, estimation of IM test results is possible by generic reaction models. Based on the NATO AOP-39 framework, the IM characteristics of non-mitigated SRM warheads are anticipated to be between Type I (SR/SJ) and Type III (FH/SH/BI/FI), which is significantly worse than the current state of the art (i.e. Type IV – VI). With IM SRM compositions and applied venting and shock mitigation, response levels of Type III for SR and SJ tests seem achievable and even better results of Type IV-V for FH/SH/BI/FI.

Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Energetic Materials and Combustion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ANTICIPATED IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL REACTIVE MATERIALS ON A WARHEADS IM — Jakob A. Breiner, Kevin M. Jaansalu · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS