Advancing Moral Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles

Autonomous vehicles (AVs), critical for future intelligent transportation, owe their advanced capabilities to reinforcement learning, which facilitates their intelligent decision-making. As AV adoption increases, concerns remain about their behavior in situations with moral uncertainty. The limitation of operating in limited environments and the challenge of determining credence values for ethical theories limits the moral uncertainty of AVs. This paper incorporates comprehensive exploration of new moral theory and scenario into simulation frameworks that can help overcome the state of the art limitations. We introduce justice theory inspired by the moral machine framework in Uber research platform to study the role of fairness among individuals in morally uncertain situations. Furthermore, we introduce novel reward structures in the framework similar to deontological and utilitarian theory to comprehensively evaluate with the state of art voting methodologies namely Nash voting and Variance voting. It was found that the variance voting system was effective across both sequential and nonsequential environments, while Nash voting was suitable primarily for sequential settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ccnc54725.2025.10976178
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Moral Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles

Heena Rathore, Henry Griffith, Mandil Pradhan, Brent Hoover et al.
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Advancing Moral Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles

Heena Rathore, Henry Griffith, Mandil Pradhan, Brent Hoover, April Valdez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs), critical for future intelligent transportation, owe their advanced capabilities to reinforcement learning, which facilitates their intelligent decision-making. As AV adoption increases, concerns remain about their behavior in situations with moral uncertainty. The limitation of operating in limited environments and the challenge of determining credence values for ethical theories limits the moral uncertainty of AVs. This paper incorporates comprehensive exploration of new moral theory and scenario into simulation frameworks that can help overcome the state of the art limitations. We introduce justice theory inspired by the moral machine framework in Uber research platform to study the role of fairness among individuals in morally uncertain situations. Furthermore, we introduce novel reward structures in the framework similar to deontological and utilitarian theory to comprehensively evaluate with the state of art voting methodologies namely Nash voting and Variance voting. It was found that the variance voting system was effective across both sequential and nonsequential environments, while Nash voting was suitable primarily for sequential settings.

San Antonio College (US), Texas State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advancing Moral Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles — Heena Rathore, Henry Griffith, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS