Work in Progress: Exploring Educators’ Perceptions on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

This study examines educators’ views on integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. A questionnaire was distributed across disciplines to explore AI adoption in pedagogy, common tools, and perceived benefits and challenges. While AI research often focuses on STEAM fields and K-12 education, this study includes Humanities, Sciences, and Business. The primary question investigates educators’ experiences and concerns about AI in classrooms. The sample comprises 134 teachers (balanced by sex), aged 27-71. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, analyze the data. The findings show increasing AI participation, especially among male teachers, using tools such as ChatGPT and Google Bard. Despite the benefits, concerns remain about ethics, human interaction, equity, and professional development. This study offers insights applicable to institutions worldwide and encourages further exploration of AI’s role in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/edunine62377.2025.10981419
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work in Progress: Exploring Educators’ Perceptions on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Lurdes Babo, Mário Cruz, Carla M. A. Pinto, Daniela Mascarenhas et al.
1 citations
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

Work in Progress: Exploring Educators’ Perceptions on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Lurdes Babo, Mário Cruz, Carla M. A. Pinto, Daniela Mascarenhas, Jorge Mendonça, Ricardo Queirós
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines educators’ views on integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. A questionnaire was distributed across disciplines to explore AI adoption in pedagogy, common tools, and perceived benefits and challenges. While AI research often focuses on STEAM fields and K-12 education, this study includes Humanities, Sciences, and Business. The primary question investigates educators’ experiences and concerns about AI in classrooms. The sample comprises 134 teachers (balanced by sex), aged 27-71. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, analyze the data. The findings show increasing AI participation, especially among male teachers, using tools such as ChatGPT and Google Bard. Despite the benefits, concerns remain about ethics, human interaction, equity, and professional development. This study offers insights applicable to institutions worldwide and encourages further exploration of AI’s role in higher education.

INESC TEC (PT), Polytechnic Institute of Porto (PT)
Erasmus+
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.