e-Assessments in Engineering - Awarding partial marks in online quizzes

The move to e-assessments was accelerated during the Covid-19 pandemic, however, the extra workload to convert paper-based assessments to digital quizzes meant their implementation lacked the refinement of a traditional mark-scheme. Engineering examinations must assess students’ problem-solving ability and allocate marks for both correct solutions and working. Partial marks must be awarded, to avoid a binary cut-off between a completely correct answer and one with minor errors. Here, we implemented a Moodle quiz designed to allocate weighted marks to partially correct responses despite common errors being made. In a cohort of 96 students, 89 received an improved mark with this partial- marking implementation. 40% of students improved their grade, and the failure rate dropped from 22% to 13%, demonstrating the importance of awarding marks for follow- through errors. We believe this work highlights the need for careful design of e-assessments to ensure the resulting grades awarded to students are appropriate and valid.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/edunine62377.2025.10981367
Primary Topic
Education Methods and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

e-Assessments in Engineering - Awarding partial marks in online quizzes

Farah Helúe Villa López, Timothy A. Vincent
Education Methods and Technologies
article

e-Assessments in Engineering - Awarding partial marks in online quizzes

Farah Helúe Villa López, Timothy A. Vincent
article en

Abstract

The move to e-assessments was accelerated during the Covid-19 pandemic, however, the extra workload to convert paper-based assessments to digital quizzes meant their implementation lacked the refinement of a traditional mark-scheme. Engineering examinations must assess students’ problem-solving ability and allocate marks for both correct solutions and working. Partial marks must be awarded, to avoid a binary cut-off between a completely correct answer and one with minor errors. Here, we implemented a Moodle quiz designed to allocate weighted marks to partially correct responses despite common errors being made. In a cohort of 96 students, 89 received an improved mark with this partial- marking implementation. 40% of students improved their grade, and the failure rate dropped from 22% to 13%, demonstrating the importance of awarding marks for follow- through errors. We believe this work highlights the need for careful design of e-assessments to ensure the resulting grades awarded to students are appropriate and valid.

University of Warwick (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Education Methods and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.