Can We Trust Your Voice? Exploring Vulnerabilities in Voice Authentication

As voice authentication technology becomes more prevalent, its security flaws and vulnerabilities are garnering increasing scrutiny. State-of-the-art deep neural network (DNN) systems for voice authentication can achieve an accuracy of over 95%. However, DNN-based models are known to be vulnerable to attacks such as adversarial examples and data poisoning. An adversary may also take advantage of the limited generalization of current DNN-based models to circumvent the system, only requiring authentic voices to impersonate others. In this paper, we leverage a data poisoning attack and two voice authentication models to investigate the vulnerability and corresponding impacts on individual user and system security. We introduce a new toolkit, the Voice Authentication Poisoning Impact Evaluator (VAPIE), incorporating conventional machine learning and VGG-based models. VAPIE is designed to predict the potential impacts of various data poisoning scenarios launched by different attack-ers and to evaluate overall system security, achieving an accuracy rate of over 70 %. This facilitates a deeper understanding and mitigation of the risks associated with voice authentication technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ccnc54725.2025.10975995
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can We Trust Your Voice? Exploring Vulnerabilities in Voice Authentication

Cameron Baird, Ke Li, Dan Lin
2 citations
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
5.63
article

Can We Trust Your Voice? Exploring Vulnerabilities in Voice Authentication

Cameron Baird, Ke Li, Dan Lin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As voice authentication technology becomes more prevalent, its security flaws and vulnerabilities are garnering increasing scrutiny. State-of-the-art deep neural network (DNN) systems for voice authentication can achieve an accuracy of over 95%. However, DNN-based models are known to be vulnerable to attacks such as adversarial examples and data poisoning. An adversary may also take advantage of the limited generalization of current DNN-based models to circumvent the system, only requiring authentic voices to impersonate others. In this paper, we leverage a data poisoning attack and two voice authentication models to investigate the vulnerability and corresponding impacts on individual user and system security. We introduce a new toolkit, the Voice Authentication Poisoning Impact Evaluator (VAPIE), incorporating conventional machine learning and VGG-based models. VAPIE is designed to predict the potential impacts of various data poisoning scenarios launched by different attack-ers and to evaluate overall system security, achieving an accuracy rate of over 70 %. This facilitates a deeper understanding and mitigation of the risks associated with voice authentication technologies.

Vanderbilt University (US)
National Science Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can We Trust Your Voice? Exploring Vulnerabilities in Voice Authentication — Cameron Baird, Ke Li, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS