Evaluation of Critical Success Factors for engineering programs improvement plans

Improvement Plans (IP) should be collaboratively developed and efficiently managed to enhance engineering programs. This study evaluates a Critical Success Factors (CSFs) model for the formulation, monitoring, and control of IPs. The model includes 6 CSFs (Stakeholders, Processes, Information, Improvement Actions, Participation and Communication, and Institution) and 47 metrics, evaluated by 7 experts in engineering program quality. Experts assessed the CSFs on Relevance and Pertinence, and the metrics on Correctness of scale and Objectivity. Results show: (a) all CSFs were relevant and pertinent, (b) the metrics had an acceptance rate of 86.9%, (c) the Objectivity rating was 80.3%, and (d) Correctness of the scale reached 63.8%. This led to the revision of 33 metrics and the inclusion of four new ones, refining the model for better decision-making in IP management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/edunine62377.2025.10981371
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Critical Success Factors for engineering programs improvement plans

Mónica Marca Aima, Lornel Rivas, Luís E. Mendoza
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Evaluation of Critical Success Factors for engineering programs improvement plans

Mónica Marca Aima, Lornel Rivas, Luís E. Mendoza
article en

Abstract

Improvement Plans (IP) should be collaboratively developed and efficiently managed to enhance engineering programs. This study evaluates a Critical Success Factors (CSFs) model for the formulation, monitoring, and control of IPs. The model includes 6 CSFs (Stakeholders, Processes, Information, Improvement Actions, Participation and Communication, and Institution) and 47 metrics, evaluated by 7 experts in engineering program quality. Experts assessed the CSFs on Relevance and Pertinence, and the metrics on Correctness of scale and Objectivity. Results show: (a) all CSFs were relevant and pertinent, (b) the metrics had an acceptance rate of 86.9%, (c) the Objectivity rating was 80.3%, and (d) Correctness of the scale reached 63.8%. This led to the revision of 33 metrics and the inclusion of four new ones, refining the model for better decision-making in IP management.

Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC), Universidad Andina del Cusco (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Critical Success Factors for engineering programs improvement plans — Mónica Marca Aima, Lornel Rivas, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS