Opportunities for Integrating Generative AI, Service-Learning and Maker Movement for Transformative Learning in Engineering Education

This article explores the possibilities of integrating Generative AI, the maker movement, and service learning in engineering education to promote transformative learning. Empirical data from first-year engineering students identified three key outcomes: increased ability to solve complex problems through creative and collaborative approaches; enhanced social skills such as teamwork and community engagement; and greater personalization and effectiveness of learning via generative tools. Lessons learned emphasize the importance of flexible curriculum planning for smooth integration of these methodologies and the necessity of teacher training to manage interdisciplinary projects. The study highlights the need for a holistic approach that links learning outcomes to the social and technological context. Ultimately, this integrative methodology offers opportunities to innovate engineering education by creating more active and meaningful educational experiences, preparing future engineers for the challenges of today's world by fostering the technical, critical, and social competencies essential to their professional education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/edunine62377.2025.10981337
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities for Integrating Generative AI, Service-Learning and Maker Movement for Transformative Learning in Engineering Education

J. G. Cerón, Leonardo Saavedra Munar, Jesús Alfonso López Sotélo, Dulfay Astrid González Jiménez
1 citations
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
1.14
article

Opportunities for Integrating Generative AI, Service-Learning and Maker Movement for Transformative Learning in Engineering Education

J. G. Cerón, Leonardo Saavedra Munar, Jesús Alfonso López Sotélo, Dulfay Astrid González Jiménez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the possibilities of integrating Generative AI, the maker movement, and service learning in engineering education to promote transformative learning. Empirical data from first-year engineering students identified three key outcomes: increased ability to solve complex problems through creative and collaborative approaches; enhanced social skills such as teamwork and community engagement; and greater personalization and effectiveness of learning via generative tools. Lessons learned emphasize the importance of flexible curriculum planning for smooth integration of these methodologies and the necessity of teacher training to manage interdisciplinary projects. The study highlights the need for a holistic approach that links learning outcomes to the social and technological context. Ultimately, this integrative methodology offers opportunities to innovate engineering education by creating more active and meaningful educational experiences, preparing future engineers for the challenges of today's world by fostering the technical, critical, and social competencies essential to their professional education.

Universidad Autónoma de Occidente (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Opportunities for Integrating Generative AI, Service-Learning and Maker Movement for Transformative Learning in Engineering Education — J. G. Cerón, Leonardo Saavedra Munar, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS