A Novel Quantitative Risk Assessment Model for Industrial Control Systems Integrating the Cyber–Physical Domain
The tight cyber–physical coupling in industrial control system (ICS) makes it vulnerable to attacks, where attackers can exploit system vulnerabilities to cross domain boundaries, causing significant losses. A novel quantitative risk assessment framework for ICS is proposed, integrating both the cyber domain and the physical domain to address potential risk assessment issues. First, an entropy-weighted technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method introducing triangular fuzzy numbers is proposed to solve the vulnerability index for multiattribute decision making to obtain the a prior probability. Second, the risk propagation mechanism of complex network topology and device interaction under ICS was studied, and the posterior probability model based on susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered was designed to dynamically capture the propagation characteristics of risks in the network. Finally, the safety loss level is defined based on standard criteria to achieve quantitative risk assessment of ICS. The proposed risk assessment model was experimentally validated on the SWaT testbed, with results confirming its feasibility and effectiveness.
Authors
- M. G. Wang
- Hang Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6697-2214)
- Zhongya Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9645-8299)
- Ke Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-819X)
- Zhiyong Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-7768)
- Ying Zhou
- Kefeng Fan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-6653)
Institutions
- Xidian University (CN)
- Henan University of Science and Technology (CN)
- China Electronics Standardization Institute (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2025-05-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2025.3564074
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.43