Dynamic Adjustment of CEO Incentives, Contracting Frictions, and Firm Performance

ABSTRACT We conceptualize equity incentive contracting as a dynamic process in which contracting frictions limit the speed at which equity incentives adjust to target levels. Slower adjustment speeds imply more prolonged deviations from value-maximizing targets and thus more severe negative effects on future performance. We find that contracting frictions significantly slow the speed of adjustment to target incentives (SOA). Consistent with frictions prolonging the persistence of deviations from target, we find that contracting frictions magnify the negative influence of deviations on future firm performance. Further, we find that the influence of contracting frictions on SOA operates through boards’ equity grant decisions. Our dynamic contracting perspective offers new insight into the relation between CEO incentives and firm performance by providing novel evidence that the speed of convergence to target incentives is a defining feature of the dynamic contracting process that translates inefficiency effects of contracting frictions into lower future performance. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from sources indicated in the text. JEL Classifications: M41.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Accounting Review
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2022-0499
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Adjustment of CEO Incentives, Contracting Frictions, and Firm Performance

Zhonglan Dai, Robert M. Bushman, Weining Zhang
2 citations
The Accounting Review
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
article

Dynamic Adjustment of CEO Incentives, Contracting Frictions, and Firm Performance

Zhonglan Dai, Robert M. Bushman, Weining Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We conceptualize equity incentive contracting as a dynamic process in which contracting frictions limit the speed at which equity incentives adjust to target levels. Slower adjustment speeds imply more prolonged deviations from value-maximizing targets and thus more severe negative effects on future performance. We find that contracting frictions significantly slow the speed of adjustment to target incentives (SOA). Consistent with frictions prolonging the persistence of deviations from target, we find that contracting frictions magnify the negative influence of deviations on future firm performance. Further, we find that the influence of contracting frictions on SOA operates through boards’ equity grant decisions. Our dynamic contracting perspective offers new insight into the relation between CEO incentives and firm performance by providing novel evidence that the speed of convergence to target incentives is a defining feature of the dynamic contracting process that translates inefficiency effects of contracting frictions into lower future performance. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from sources indicated in the text. JEL Classifications: M41.

The Accounting ReviewVol. 100(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic Adjustment of CEO Incentives, Contracting Frictions, and Firm Performance — Zhonglan Dai, Robert M. Bushman, et al. · The Accounting Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS