Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for localized gastric cancer: Meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies with the implementation of a novel morbidity index

Localised gastric cancer is potentially curable via minimally invasive radical gastrectomy. Our systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of robotic gastrectomy (RG) versus laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for localised gastric cancer based on propensity-score matching studies. PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, Embase, Web of science and Scopus were systematically searched for publications before April 2023. We used mean difference for continuous data and risk-ratios for dichotomous data. Random and fixed-effect models were utilized depending on degree of clinical heterogeneity. Additionally, we introduced a novel index as an additional parameter of morbidity to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of intervention effect. 15 PSM studies involving 10,389 patients were included in the final analysis. RG demonstrated significantly lower morbidity in terms of overall complications [RR 0.75 (95 %CI 0.62, 0.91) p = 0.0004], Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa morbidity rate [RR 0.71, (95 %CI 0.58, 0.86) p = 0.0007] and intra-abdominal complication (IAC) [RR 0.73 (95 %CI 0.57, 0.94), p = 0.02)]. These findings were further supported by the novel morbidity index. There is no significant difference in mortality rate. RG had longer operation time [MD 36.62, (95 %CI 26.74, 46.51) p < 0.0001], lesser blood loss [MD -16.90 (95 %CI -25.38, −8.42), p < 0.0001)] and higher lymph node yield [MD 1.53 (95 %CI 0.51, 2.55), p = 0.003]. Cost was significantly higher in RG [MD +3295.78 USD (95 %CI 2813.13, 3778.42) p < 0.00001]. Parameters of recovery (i.e. hospital stay) demonstrated no clinical significance. Long-term oncological outcomes were largely comparable. Despite longer operation time and cost, RG is safe and feasible with potential improvements in morbidity and short-term outcomes. Comparative outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. SynopsisOur study highlights the superior performance of robotic gastrectomy in addressing localised gastric cancer. Despite lengthier procedures and higher expenses, it demonstrates improved morbidity (substantiated by a novel morbidity index) and short-term outcomes. Recovery duration and long-term oncological safety remain consistent when compared to laparoscopic surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Surgery
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.04.120
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for localized gastric cancer: Meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies with the implementation of a novel morbidity index

Bijendra Patel, Bikramjit Pal, Kartik Saxena, Martin Tze Wah Kueh et al.
Asian Journal of Surgery
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for localized gastric cancer: Meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies with the implementation of a novel morbidity index

Bijendra Patel, Bikramjit Pal, Kartik Saxena, Martin Tze Wah Kueh, Fahd Adeeb, Seng Pei Khaw
article en

Abstract

Localised gastric cancer is potentially curable via minimally invasive radical gastrectomy. Our systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of robotic gastrectomy (RG) versus laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for localised gastric cancer based on propensity-score matching studies. PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, Embase, Web of science and Scopus were systematically searched for publications before April 2023. We used mean difference for continuous data and risk-ratios for dichotomous data. Random and fixed-effect models were utilized depending on degree of clinical heterogeneity. Additionally, we introduced a novel index as an additional parameter of morbidity to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of intervention effect. 15 PSM studies involving 10,389 patients were included in the final analysis. RG demonstrated significantly lower morbidity in terms of overall complications [RR 0.75 (95 %CI 0.62, 0.91) p = 0.0004], Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa morbidity rate [RR 0.71, (95 %CI 0.58, 0.86) p = 0.0007] and intra-abdominal complication (IAC) [RR 0.73 (95 %CI 0.57, 0.94), p = 0.02)]. These findings were further supported by the novel morbidity index. There is no significant difference in mortality rate. RG had longer operation time [MD 36.62, (95 %CI 26.74, 46.51) p < 0.0001], lesser blood loss [MD -16.90 (95 %CI -25.38, −8.42), p < 0.0001)] and higher lymph node yield [MD 1.53 (95 %CI 0.51, 2.55), p = 0.003]. Cost was significantly higher in RG [MD +3295.78 USD (95 %CI 2813.13, 3778.42) p < 0.00001]. Parameters of recovery (i.e. hospital stay) demonstrated no clinical significance. Long-term oncological outcomes were largely comparable. Despite longer operation time and cost, RG is safe and feasible with potential improvements in morbidity and short-term outcomes. Comparative outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. SynopsisOur study highlights the superior performance of robotic gastrectomy in addressing localised gastric cancer. Despite lengthier procedures and higher expenses, it demonstrates improved morbidity (substantiated by a novel morbidity index) and short-term outcomes. Recovery duration and long-term oncological safety remain consistent when compared to laparoscopic surgery.

Asian Journal of SurgeryVol. 48(7)
University College Dublin (IE), RCSI & UCD Malaysia Campus (MY), Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.