A Comparison Between First and Second Language Generative Discourse Production in Bilingual Persons With Mild Dementia

Purpose: With the increasing prevalence of dementia, quantifying the relationships between languages in discourse expression for bilingual speakers provides valuable insight into the impact of bilingualism on language discourse expression. The purpose of the study was to compare expository discourse in first language (L1; Kannada) and second language (L2; English) of healthy elderly adults (HEA) and persons with mild dementia (PWMD). Method: Nine bilingual PWMD and 10 bilingual age-matched HEA with vocational proficiency in L1 and L2 participated in the study. Discourse samples were gathered from each participant, transcribed verbatim, and segmented into the four related T-unit variables: content (number of T-units, number of clauses per T-unit), complexity (number of words per T-unit), and relevance (number of incomplete and irrelevant T-unit). T-unit scores were statistically analyzed between their L1 and L2 using one-way analysis of variance. Results: There were statistically significant differences between groups, with HEA producing more content, complexity, and relevance than PWMD. Furthermore, within HEA, significantly more content was produced in L1. However, there were no statistically significant differences in T-units between L1 and L2 within the PWMD group. Conclusions: There is a general pattern of decline in discourse production in PWMD compared with HEA in both L1 and L2. While the healthy adults demonstrated a clear dominance in their L1, this was not evident in PWMD. Within the PWMD groups, L1 and L2 were found to decline at the same pace. Therefore, when evaluating bilingual PWMD, assessing their discourse in either their L1 or L2 is appropriate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_persp-24-00130
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison Between First and Second Language Generative Discourse Production in Bilingual Persons With Mild Dementia

Amanda Stead, E J Yoder, Deepa Srikant
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

A Comparison Between First and Second Language Generative Discourse Production in Bilingual Persons With Mild Dementia

Amanda Stead, E J Yoder, Deepa Srikant
article en

Abstract

Purpose: With the increasing prevalence of dementia, quantifying the relationships between languages in discourse expression for bilingual speakers provides valuable insight into the impact of bilingualism on language discourse expression. The purpose of the study was to compare expository discourse in first language (L1; Kannada) and second language (L2; English) of healthy elderly adults (HEA) and persons with mild dementia (PWMD). Method: Nine bilingual PWMD and 10 bilingual age-matched HEA with vocational proficiency in L1 and L2 participated in the study. Discourse samples were gathered from each participant, transcribed verbatim, and segmented into the four related T-unit variables: content (number of T-units, number of clauses per T-unit), complexity (number of words per T-unit), and relevance (number of incomplete and irrelevant T-unit). T-unit scores were statistically analyzed between their L1 and L2 using one-way analysis of variance. Results: There were statistically significant differences between groups, with HEA producing more content, complexity, and relevance than PWMD. Furthermore, within HEA, significantly more content was produced in L1. However, there were no statistically significant differences in T-units between L1 and L2 within the PWMD group. Conclusions: There is a general pattern of decline in discourse production in PWMD compared with HEA in both L1 and L2. While the healthy adults demonstrated a clear dominance in their L1, this was not evident in PWMD. Within the PWMD groups, L1 and L2 were found to decline at the same pace. Therefore, when evaluating bilingual PWMD, assessing their discourse in either their L1 or L2 is appropriate.

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest GroupsVol. 10(3)
Pacific University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparison Between First and Second Language Generative Discourse Production in Bilingual Persons With Mild Dementia — Amanda Stead, E J Yoder, et al. · Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS