Development and validation of a generic self-assessment scale for K-12 teachers as feedback givers: Insights from item response theory and factor analysis

Abstract This study aimed to develop and validate a generic self-assessment scale for Chinese K-12 teachers to evaluate their feedback-giving literacy in classroom settings, using Item Response Theory (IRT), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The scale was constructed based on a conceptual framework encompassing four components: knowledge, skills, values, and actionability. A pilot test with 1068 teachers led to the selection of 30 items, which were then validated with a sample of 980 teachers. EFA revealed a clear factor structure, explaining 65.42% of the total variance, while CFA confirmed a good model fit (CFI > 0.9, RMSEA < 0.08). The final scale demonstrated high internal consistency (McDonald’s Omega coefficient = 0.97) across all subscales. IRT analyses indicated strong measurement precision, particularly in the skills and actionability subscales. Although limited to the Chinese K-12 context and based on self-reported data, the findings offer a valuable tool for teachers to assess and improve their feedback practices. The scale can be used for professional development and further research on feedback-giving literacy. Future studies should explore its applicability in different cultural contexts and investigate the development of teacher feedback literacy over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04927-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a generic self-assessment scale for K-12 teachers as feedback givers: Insights from item response theory and factor analysis

Hua Yin, Jinyan Huang, Xingcheng Liu, Chang Young Kang
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
article

Development and validation of a generic self-assessment scale for K-12 teachers as feedback givers: Insights from item response theory and factor analysis

Hua Yin, Jinyan Huang, Xingcheng Liu, Chang Young Kang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to develop and validate a generic self-assessment scale for Chinese K-12 teachers to evaluate their feedback-giving literacy in classroom settings, using Item Response Theory (IRT), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The scale was constructed based on a conceptual framework encompassing four components: knowledge, skills, values, and actionability. A pilot test with 1068 teachers led to the selection of 30 items, which were then validated with a sample of 980 teachers. EFA revealed a clear factor structure, explaining 65.42% of the total variance, while CFA confirmed a good model fit (CFI > 0.9, RMSEA < 0.08). The final scale demonstrated high internal consistency (McDonald’s Omega coefficient = 0.97) across all subscales. IRT analyses indicated strong measurement precision, particularly in the skills and actionability subscales. Although limited to the Chinese K-12 context and based on self-reported data, the findings offer a valuable tool for teachers to assess and improve their feedback practices. The scale can be used for professional development and further research on feedback-giving literacy. Future studies should explore its applicability in different cultural contexts and investigate the development of teacher feedback literacy over time.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Jiangsu University (CN)
Jiangsu University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Student Assessment and Feedback
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.