Sonic Boom Propagation Using High and Low-Fidelity Methods

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The advancement of civil supersonic aircraft is significantly constrained due to the intense noise generated by the shock waves that form during cruise, commonly referred to as the sonic boom. Due to these excessive noise levels, regulatory authorities currently ban supersonic flights over land. This study presents a comprehensive methodology to evaluate sonic booms in mid- and far-field regions, starting with a precise estimation of the near-field pressure signature produced by the shock wave system. While high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques typically provide near-field sonic boom predictions, specific propagation models must be used at greater distances, as CFD becomes prohibitively expensive beyond approximately 10 km.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The focus of this research is a comparative analysis of a low-fidelity propagation approach, such as Whitham’s equation, and a high-fidelity CFD-based approach for assessing sonic boom propagation over medium range distances. The low-fidelity method analytically propagates the pressure signature, leveraging CFD-generated sonic boom data taken at shorter ranges. Results show that the low-fidelity method achieves comparable accuracy to direct CFD-based approaches while substantially reducing computational costs. To demonstrate its effectiveness, the study examines various aircraft configurations, including a hypersonic test platform and a model similar to the Concorde, were selected as test cases within the framework of the European MORE&LESS project.</div></div>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-0034
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sonic Boom Propagation Using High and Low-Fidelity Methods

Francesco Petrosino, Mattia Barbarino, Antimo Glorioso, Giovanni Fasulo
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
article

Sonic Boom Propagation Using High and Low-Fidelity Methods

Francesco Petrosino, Mattia Barbarino, Antimo Glorioso, Giovanni Fasulo
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The advancement of civil supersonic aircraft is significantly constrained due to the intense noise generated by the shock waves that form during cruise, commonly referred to as the sonic boom. Due to these excessive noise levels, regulatory authorities currently ban supersonic flights over land. This study presents a comprehensive methodology to evaluate sonic booms in mid- and far-field regions, starting with a precise estimation of the near-field pressure signature produced by the shock wave system. While high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques typically provide near-field sonic boom predictions, specific propagation models must be used at greater distances, as CFD becomes prohibitively expensive beyond approximately 10 km.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">The focus of this research is a comparative analysis of a low-fidelity propagation approach, such as Whitham’s equation, and a high-fidelity CFD-based approach for assessing sonic boom propagation over medium range distances. The low-fidelity method analytically propagates the pressure signature, leveraging CFD-generated sonic boom data taken at shorter ranges. Results show that the low-fidelity method achieves comparable accuracy to direct CFD-based approaches while substantially reducing computational costs. To demonstrate its effectiveness, the study examines various aircraft configurations, including a hypersonic test platform and a model similar to the Concorde, were selected as test cases within the framework of the European MORE&LESS project.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.